0
Ah, the Roman Republic, what a fascinating time in history. One of the pros was the shared power among different branches of government, promoting balance and fairness. However, as the Republic grew, conflicts arose, leading to power struggles and eventually the downfall of this noble system. Remember, even in challenges, there is always beauty to be found.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ross
Professor
LaoOne pro of the Roman Republic was its system of checks and balances, with power divided among various branches of government. This helped prevent any one individual from becoming too powerful. Another pro was the development of a legal system that emphasized the rights of citizens. However, a major con was the persistence of social and economic inequality, with a small elite holding most of the power and wealth. Additionally, the constant power struggles and civil wars eventually led to the collapse of the Republic.
Oh, dude, like the Roman Republic had some sweet perks like a Senate where they could debate stuff and a cool system of checks and balances. But, you know, it also had its downsides, like power struggles, corruption, and the occasional dictator trying to take over. Just your typical government drama, am I right?
The main reason why the Republic didn't work would be greed, and the rapidly changing face of roman society,
Rome at this time had just won all three of the Punic wars with Carthage, and as a result the empire became richer and so society was changing at a greater pace than the Roman Republic could deal with. Political infighting was getting worse, and the large gapes between social classes was causing tension and was leading to social instability.
When the republic began, property owners were expected to voluntarily defend the state. However, the majority of the army were small farmers, they couldn't afford to spend a long time away from the farm. This led them to loose business and stability.
The taxes were too high. The richest people exempted themselves from taxes, the middle and working class got so poor that they couldn't support the government with their taxes and the empire collapsed.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which government preceded did the roman republic pass on to future civilizations?
The phrasing is unclear. The form of government which preceded the Roman Republic was the Roman Monarchy. The Republic was followed by rule by emperors. However, the Republic did not pass this on to future civilisations because: 1) it was the collapse of the Republic, rather than some sort of handover; 2) no future civilisation tried to replicate Rome's period of rule by emperors or, for that matter, the Roman Monarchy.
What were some pros and cons of European exploration?
ProsSailors learned more about exploring (longitude and latitude) and improved in navigationVasco da Gama discovered a route to India (THIS IS GOOD!)South America wouldn't be speaking Spanish, and Brazil wouldn't be speaking Portuguese, if it wasn't for EuropeColonization brought massive development of plantations, boosting European economyNow for the cons...ConsMan- Those Europeans brought DISEASES!They were racists.
What is the differences between the Roman republic and the Roman empire?
This is a confusing question. First please remember that Rome was already an empire under the republic. What is erroneously called the "Roman empire" is the Principate. The government of the republic was by popular election while the government of the principate was by appointment. Both forms of government used the senate as a consulting body.
What happened to Rome in 31 BC?
In 51 B.C., Queen Cleopatra V11 was the last Macedonian to rule over Egypt. She shared the throne with some other members of her family until Egypt was conquered by the Romans. Egypt became part of the Roman Empire in 31 B.C..
Which branch of the roman government was made up solely of patricians?
At the beginning of the Roman Republic the patricians controlled the Roman state by monopolising the consulship (the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the Republic) the seats of the senate and the priesthoods, which in those days had an important political role. With the 200-year long Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians, the rich plebeians managed to obtain power-sharing with the patricians. They gained access to the consulship and the new offices of state which were created as the Republic developed, the seats of the senate and some of the priesthoods. They were co-opted into a patrician-(rich) plebeian oligarchy.
