Ah, the Roman Republic, what a fascinating time in history. One of the pros was the shared power among different branches of government, promoting balance and fairness. However, as the Republic grew, conflicts arose, leading to power struggles and eventually the downfall of this noble system. Remember, even in challenges, there is always beauty to be found.
One pro of the Roman Republic was its system of checks and balances, with power divided among various branches of government. This helped prevent any one individual from becoming too powerful. Another pro was the development of a legal system that emphasized the rights of citizens. However, a major con was the persistence of social and economic inequality, with a small elite holding most of the power and wealth. Additionally, the constant power struggles and civil wars eventually led to the collapse of the Republic.
The main reason why the Republic didn't work would be greed, and the rapidly changing face of roman society,
Rome at this time had just won all three of the Punic wars with Carthage, and as a result the empire became richer and so society was changing at a greater pace than the Roman Republic could deal with. Political infighting was getting worse, and the large gapes between social classes was causing tension and was leading to social instability.
When the republic began, property owners were expected to voluntarily defend the state. However, the majority of the army were small farmers, they couldn't afford to spend a long time away from the farm. This led them to loose business and stability.
The taxes were too high. The richest people exempted themselves from taxes, the middle and working class got so poor that they couldn't support the government with their taxes and the empire collapsed.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The pros of the Roman republic, before corruption set in, were that it was a government elected by the people. The men in office were limited to one year terms so that one person could not hold power and impose his will on the people as a monarch did. In the republic all citizens had certain rights that were respected. Fairness for all citizens and the protection of the state were the keywords of the republic.
The phrasing is unclear. The form of government which preceded the Roman Republic was the Roman Monarchy. The Republic was followed by rule by emperors. However, the Republic did not pass this on to future civilisations because: 1) it was the collapse of the Republic, rather than some sort of handover; 2) no future civilisation tried to replicate Rome's period of rule by emperors or, for that matter, the Roman Monarchy.
ProsSailors learned more about exploring (longitude and latitude) and improved in navigationVasco da Gama discovered a route to India (THIS IS GOOD!)South America wouldn't be speaking Spanish, and Brazil wouldn't be speaking Portuguese, if it wasn't for EuropeColonization brought massive development of plantations, boosting European economyNow for the cons...ConsMan- Those Europeans brought DISEASES!They were racists.
This is a confusing question. First please remember that Rome was already an empire under the republic. What is erroneously called the "Roman empire" is the Principate. The government of the republic was by popular election while the government of the principate was by appointment. Both forms of government used the senate as a consulting body.
In 51 B.C., Queen Cleopatra V11 was the last Macedonian to rule over Egypt. She shared the throne with some other members of her family until Egypt was conquered by the Romans. Egypt became part of the Roman Empire in 31 B.C..
At the beginning of the Roman Republic the patricians controlled the Roman state by monopolising the consulship (the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the Republic) the seats of the senate and the priesthoods, which in those days had an important political role. With the 200-year long Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians, the rich plebeians managed to obtain power-sharing with the patricians. They gained access to the consulship and the new offices of state which were created as the Republic developed, the seats of the senate and some of the priesthoods. They were co-opted into a patrician-(rich) plebeian oligarchy.
There are no pros or cons. It is a neutral holiday.
The pros and cons of staying at a Boise hotel is that the pros are you will have a cheap hotel. The cons are that the hotel will be bad quality and you will not have some features.
there are no pros. cons are that you can be talking to some molester or someone that is very dangerous
The scalawags were pros carpetbaggers were cons in the exPansion in the 19th century
The pros and cons of a Songy Digital Camcorder include the basic pros and cons of any digital camcorders. Some of the pros are the compact design and the ability to connect to a computer or a television for large-screen viewing. Some of the cons are the price and the battery life.
Some pros and cons of GUI in operating system are: Pros: -Easy to learn -Harder to make mistakes Cons: -Slower if you know what you want done
Online there are the videos called "Pros and Cons of Spanking Your Child", "Spanking Your Kids: Discipline or Abuse", and "Spanking And Child Discipline-The Pros And Cons".
share pro and cons for hernan cortez
k
pros are that students learn to have teamwork. Cons are that some people don't even do work and tell others to do
the pros were that they carried machine guns and bombs. the cons, were that they were easy to shoot out of the sky
The pros are that international trade started with this event. The cons are that the road was dangerous and often thieves would be out waiting.