0
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In the Roman Empire the wealthy citizens were called?
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
What were the poor ancient Romans called?
Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.
What were people called who could write in ancient rome?
People who could write in ancient Rome we called either a scriptor, an auctor, or a scriba. A scriba connoted a professional writer.
What did tata mean in ancient rome?
In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.
Why was ancient Greece least successful than ancient rome?
Because Ancient Greece did have the same technology as Ancient Rome as Ancient Rome were technologically advanced. Ancient Rome had a stronger army and a more stronger and structured democracy.
What were the wealthy landowners of ancient rome were called?
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
What are people who own slaves called in ancient Rome?
Wealthy people
In the Roman Empire the wealthy citizens were called?
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
Was ancient Rome wealthy?
Yes,ancient Rome was very wealthy.Its treasures are the proof.
What is the name of the business person in ancient roman period?
A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.
What type of people in rome could becom consuls?
The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.
How did you define how wealthy you were in ancient rome?
the number of weapons you have
What were the poor ancient Romans called?
Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.
How did ancient rome people get around?
most civilians walked but wealthy civilians would buy horses or carriages
What did the wealthy eat in ancient rome?
biscuits or pancakes in honey
How would you call a rich person in ancient rome?
Wealthy
How did ancient Rome's wealthy differ from the poors burial practices?
Wealthy Eygptians preserved bodies as mummies
