0
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Professor
Taiga
CoachThe style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
The style of Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. The only difference was in the quality of the fabrics. the upper classes word finer woolens and some even had linen or cotton, while the lower classes wore the coarser wools. The wealthy were also able to afford the more expensive dyes for their clothing.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In the Roman Empire the wealthy citizens were called?
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
What were the poor ancient Romans called?
Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.
What were people called who could write in ancient rome?
People who could write in ancient Rome we called either a scriptor, an auctor, or a scriba. A scriba connoted a professional writer.
What did tata mean in ancient rome?
In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.
What is a Blacksmith in ancient Rome?
In ancient rome a blacksmith is a blacksmith
