Both the Roman and British empires influenced the regions of their worlds that they conquered or occupied. Both empires introduced their laws and cultural values the empires had. Both empires also recruited members of these regions to become part of their military forces.
1. They both constructed roads for trading purposes. 2. They were both empires, and therefore had emperors. 3. Both empires were long-lasting 4. Both empires covered a great amount of land Hope this helps. :)
The Roman Soldiers were the most important because they were the key to the Roman's success. Without them the "Roman Revolution" would have never been possible! Roman soldiers built roads, bridges, ports, public building's and the Hadrian's Wall! The Roman Civilians would rely on the Roman Soldiers to act as their "local police force ".
He acomplished a vast empire from Mongolia to the edge of the roman empire this is why the chines hated the stupid mongorians.He burned Rome to the ground, he killed millions of people, he spread terror through out both the Easter and Wester Roman Empires, and he conquered thousands of miles of land.
An empire is bigger. Two examples are the Ancient Roman Empire (the nation being Italy), and the British Empire (the nation being Great Britain). Both Italy and Great Britain created their empires by conquering other countries.
here follow the Roman values affect both the rise and the downfall so explain about rise and downfall and may it would be the best answer ... try it out
Both the Roman and British empires influenced the regions of their worlds that they conquered or occupied. Both empires introduced their laws and cultural values the empires had. Both empires also recruited members of these regions to become part of their military forces.
military conquest
It didn't. Both those empires were gone by the time Islam began.
Both empires shared similar laws and traditions.
Both were Great Roman Emperors who contributed much to the Roman Empire.
Civilizations often transcend Empires and are not dependent on their survival. For example, Roman civilization was both a Republic and an Empire.
1. They both constructed roads for trading purposes. 2. They were both empires, and therefore had emperors. 3. Both empires were long-lasting 4. Both empires covered a great amount of land Hope this helps. :)
They were both concerned with expanding their empires They had similar religions
Japan's steady victories on both land and sea during the war, contributed to the Tsars downfall. Had the situation been reversed, the Tsar may have become more popular.
Men, most definitely, for both empires.
Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.Cleopatra contributed to the downfall of Marc Antony by luring him to Alexandria and indulging him in his weaknesses. She did this for political purposes, but as she was not a very brilliant politician (contrary to the current notion) her schemes backfired and both Marc Antony and herself ended up the losers.