The change form the Roman Republic to rule by emperors was not a transition. It was more abrupt than that. Rule by emperors was the result of the Republic imploding and collapsing by being torn apart by civil wars. Also note that historians make a confusing use of he term Roman Empire. They use it both in territorial terms to indicate Rome' conquests and to refer the period when Rome was ruled by emperors. In territorial terms, the Roman Republic already had an empire. In fact, much of Rome's imperial expansion occurred during the period of the Republic.
The Roman Republic fell under the weight of imperial expansion. The central government had become dysfunctional, and lost control over the provinces (conquered territories). The governors of the provinces became unruly and treated their provinces as if they were their personal fiefs. Tax collection in the provinces was carried out by private collectors who 'farmed' the taxes to line their pockets through extortion, which created discontent in the provinces, Corruption was rampant. A reform of military recruitment made the soldiers loyal to the commanders of their legions who could use them to obtain what they wanted through the threat of or the use of military violence. In 71 BC Crassus and Pompey camped their troops outside Rome to have themselves elected as consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). Pompey was not even eligible on the grounds of being below the required age and of not having served some public offices which were required before the consulship. In the last 64 years of the Republic there were 12 civil wars. In 88 BC Sulla entered the city of Rome with his troops during his first civil war against forces of Marius, even though Roman religion forbade the bearing of arms within the city walls.
Another problem in the Late Republic was the increase in the number of dispossessed peasants who lost their land to the expanding large landed estates which used slaves, who were war captives. These people flocked to Rome to try to eke out a living, swelling the masses of the poor in the city. The problem of poverty became a political hot potato which led to the conflict between the populares and the optimates. The former was a political faction which championed the cause of the poor and tried to introduce reforms to help them. The latter was a conservative political faction which favoured the aristocracy and opposed reforms. The senators were seen as being concerned with the interests of the aristocracy, rather than those of the poor and were unpopular among the middle and lower classes. They were also seen as being corrupt. Many of the civil wars were related to clashes between strong military leaders and the conflict between populares and optimates spilling into violence.
Julius Caesar waged a civil war against the forces of the senate and assumed sole power in Rome (the Republic was normally headed by two annually elected consuls) for five years and tried to tackle Rome's problems. However, he was assassinated. More civil wars followed his death. Augustus won the final civil war of the Republic, which was a fight with Marc Antony over who would become the sole ruler of Rome and her territories. He gained control over the army and amassed great wealth through the spoil of war. He used both to establish his own absolute rule and became the first Roman emperor. His tight control over the state restored a strong central government and political stability. Rule by emperors continued for 503 years
There was not a tradition from a republic to an empire. Rome already had an empire during the Republic. Much of Rome's imperial expansion occurred during the republican period. The Roman system of government changed from a republic to the absolute rule by emperors. The change was due to the collapse of the republic, rather than a transition
. The Roman Republic fell under the weight of imperial expansion. The central government had become dysfunctional, and lost control over the provinces (conquered territories). The governors of the provinces became unruly and treated their provinces as if they were their personal fiefs. Tax collection in the provinces was carried out by private collectors who 'farmed' the taxes to line their pockets through extortion, which created discontent in the provinces, Corruption was rampant. A reform of military recruitment made the soldiers loyal to the commanders of their legions who could use them to obtain what they wanted through the threat of or the use of military violence. In the last 64 years of the Republic there were 12 civil wars. In 88 BC Sulla entered the city of Rome with his loyal troops during his first civil war against forces of Marius, even though Roman religion forbade the bearing of arms within the city walls.
Another problem in the Late Republic was the increase in the number of dispossessed peasants who lost their land to the expanding large landed estates which used slaves, who were war captives. These people flocked to Rome to try to eke out a living, swelling the masses of the poor in the city. The problem of poverty became a political hot potato which led to the conflict between the populares and the optimates. The former was a political faction which championed the cause of the poor and tried to introduce reforms to help them. The latter was a conservative political faction which favoured the aristocracy and opposed reforms. The senators were seen as being concerned with the interests of the aristocracy, rather than those of the poor and were unpopular among the middle and lower classes. They were also seen as being corrupt. Many of the civil wars were related to clashes between strong military leaders and the conflict between populares and optimates spilling into violence.
Julius Caesar waged a civil war against the forces of the senate and assumed sole power in Rome (the Republic was normally headed by two annually elected consuls) for five years and tried to tackle Rome's problems. However, he was assassinated. More civil wars followed his death. Augustus won the final civil war of the Republic, which was a fight with Marc Antony over who would become the sole ruler of Rome and her territories. He gained control over the army and amassed great wealth through the spoil of war. He used both to establish his own absolute rule and became the first Roman emperor. His tight control over the state restored a strong central government and political stability. Rule by emperors continued for 503 years
n
Ancient Greeks faced problems of many kinds in their effort to survive and to thrive. Natural hardships such as disease, famine, and weather vicissitudes had to be faced. Competition from their neighbors within Greek civilization (rival city-states and alliances) as well as overseas threats from the aggressive empire of Persia were other problems.
Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.
Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire
Caesar exposed the weakness of the Roman Republic through his extremely developed military and organisational skills. He proved that the Roman republican senate was not capable of handling the empire's affairs through his demonstration of what Rome required to be a successful republican empire. According to Örjan Wikander[1], Caesar's short reign ended the republic.---- [1] Örjan Wikander is a modern historian who published a brief landmark study in 1984, covering areas of Caesars reign.
n
n
The impact of the transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire upon the architecture of the time is hard. When it was made the republic was never restored. The installation of the Princeps came with it more structures of grand design. The Pantheon, the arch of Titus, and the Colosseum might serve as examples of this.
Political corruption in Rome contributed to the decline of the Roman Republic by undermining the effectiveness of its government institutions, eroding public trust in leaders, and leading to power struggles among the elite. This corruption allowed for the rise of authoritarian figures, such as Julius Caesar, who exploited the weaknesses in the system to seize power and ultimately led to the transition from the Republic to the Roman Empire.
These are two different terms. A republic is a system of government; an empire is a group of countries under one control. Rome was an empire long before it had an emperor - the republic ruled an empire covering half of Europe.from Spain to Greece. The republic was a limited democracy ruled by the Senate, The next phase did away with the limited democracy and for 200 years became a power-sharing arrangement between emperor and senate.
what empire
Ancient Greeks faced problems of many kinds in their effort to survive and to thrive. Natural hardships such as disease, famine, and weather vicissitudes had to be faced. Competition from their neighbors within Greek civilization (rival city-states and alliances) as well as overseas threats from the aggressive empire of Persia were other problems.
The monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in place
Empire.
In comparing a republic and an empire, you are trying to compare apples and oranges. An empire is a large holding. A republic is a form of government. The two have only a marginal relationship. An empire can be any large conglomerate, such as an industrial empire, a publishing empire, a financial empire or a political empire. A republic, as said above is a form or type of government. In a republic the people elect their officials to speak for them. A political empire, such as the Roman empire, can be ruled by a republic form of government, and it was for a time, until the principate form of government replaced the republic and ruled the empire. A more recent empire, the British empire, was ruled by a monarchy. A political empire can be ruled by various forms of government, with a republic being one of the types of government.
Its not in any empire. Its a republic.
Certainly. A republic can become am empire and an empire can become a republic, or several republics. Any form of government can be changed into any other form of government.