The Roman counsuls did not have absolute power during wartime, only a dictator had absolute power. The counsuls could lead and army and many times the senate authorized this. The counsul had the control of his army, but the power of the state was still in the hands of the senate.
He installed the 'Pax Romana', which brought relative security to the inhabitants of the Roman empire. Concurrently, he was the one who started building walls around the empire. He generally brought stability to a region troubled with violence, civil war and famine, whilst setting out the principles of the function of emperor, which were consequently eroded by nearly all emperors successing him.
They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.They didn't. To begin with the senate in ancient Rome had no electoral powers. It was a consulting body. During the republic the officials were elected by the assemblies of the people. During the reign of emperors, the previous emperor either designated an heir or a strong contender with the backing of the military became emperor. The senate just ratified the new emperor--they gave their rubber stamp to whoever came out on top.
The senate during the early republican phase was powerful because it was completely ruled by the patrician class which was a group of the most influential, wealthy and descendants of nobility. During the later stage of the republic the senate was the seat of power because it held th emajority of power as well as land through the use of latifundia. As well as this it organised the armys which held the power in Rome. During the empire stage the senate had very little actual power. This is because the emperors had slowly taken away those rights and taken the powers for themselves.
During the Republic, the Senate appointed commanders of each legion. The selected senators raised the armies, financing the equipment and wages themselves, and, occasionally, being reimbursed by the Senate. Under the Empire, The commanders were appointed by and sworn to serve the emperor, with the consent of the Senate.
Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.
Woodrow Wilson during WW1 assigned the head of the War Industries Board the position of industry czar.
during the Recess of the SenateThe president can appoint anybody without anyone's approval because it is one of their privaleges as president. They get to carry out certain duties and this is one pf them
The executive branch is the branch of the US government that enforces the laws made by the legislative branch. They don't, however, interpret the laws. The head of the executive branch is the president, the head of state. 1. Grant reprieves and pardons (except in impeachment cases) 2. Appoint Ambassadors (again with the consent of senate) 3. Appoints public ministers and consuls (with the consent of senate) 4. Can reject or accept the judges of the supreme court (with the consent of senate) 5. Can appoint basically any officer that is ranked below him with the consent of the senate 6. Can fill up vacancies during the recess of the senate
yes, when a Senate seat is vacated during a term, the Governor appoints a replacement but only for 2 years then an election must be held unless the regular election date comes up first
... gave allied leaders in Paris a stronger bargaining position.
In the Senate, the Senate Finance Committee holds jurisdiction of taxation. The forerunner of the Committee, the Select Finance Committee, was established during the fourteenth session of Congress. The structure of the current Senate Finance came about as the result of the Committee Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970.
Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.
No. It only depends on how many supreme court justices leave office during the Presidents term. For example, if all of them died and/or decided to retire, the president would have the opportunity to appoint the entire bench.
Article 2, Section 2, Clause 3
When can the president appoint people without approval by anyone else? When can the president appoint people without approval by anyone else?
Martial law is the term usually used to describe temporary regulations during emergencies.