Serfs are often described as unfree. More accurately, because that term is usually misunderstood, they might best be called peasants who were bound to the land they lived on but did not own.
The problem with the term unfree, is that most people think it means slave, which it was not. Serfs did not have a right to move away from the land they lived on, but unlike slaves they could not be bought or sold, and unlike slaves, they had a right to live and work on the land. They owed the lord rent, usually in the form of labor or a part of the crop, but they had a right to expect the lord to protect them.
There is a link to an article on serfs below.
Chat with our AI personalities
Serfs were members of the lowest class in feudal society. They were bound to the land and performed acts of labor for legal rights, often protection, from the lords.
Many people wanted to turn back Progressive reforms from the previous decades.apex-A tension between modernism and fundamentalism
Heck! I dont know what serfs do! That's why I asked this thing!!! Heck! I dont know what serfs do! That's why I asked this thing!!!
no
no
Yes, an aristocrat would give serfs land in an agreement that the serf would protect the lord.