Tenant farmers
serf, poor people, needed the strength and protection from a landowner. So, serfs worked for the landowner in exchange for protection.
At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.At the beginning of the republic, the rich landowners who controlled the senate were the patricians.
The medieval cottar is believed to have been a simple serf, who lived by farming and who had limited lands to farm and no special office. The role of the cottar was to grow food. The word cottage originally meant the home of a cottar.
He who controls the past controls the future is a very famous quote. The quote means that having information about the past can easily help you in predicting the future.
It was similar because the feudal hierarchy had high ranked people on top and low ranked people on the bottom. The encomienda system was when the person is assigned a number of slaves/workers to do things for them such as hard labour. Feudalism is when the high ranked person orders the low ranked person to work for them. I'm sure now you see the similarities. They have the high ranked people in control and low ranked people working. So that is the similarities low ranked people working for high ranked people for both systems.
Sometimes, but no more so than straight people. Sexual orientation is not a factor in being emotionally exploited.
Landowners are people who own land. With regard to antiquity and the Middle Ages this term refers to the owners of large landed estates, as opposed to peasants who owned small family farms with plots of land which were not bigger than what the family's labour could till.
Patricians. The other poor people who weren't slaves were called Plebeians. (pronounced plaabeeans)
Rich people
serf, poor people, needed the strength and protection from a landowner. So, serfs worked for the landowner in exchange for protection.
the people who were loaded and had lots of guwapa
The large landowner minority. The small landowner majority. Non-propertied men. Women. Aliens. Serfs and slaves.
adulteration
We could call people whonown property owners or a landowner
That is a somewhat broad issue, because there are many different forms of manipulation, and many different motives for manipulating people, and different outcomes of that manipulation. Sometimes people are being guided in the right direction, for which they will feel grateful. Sometimes people are exploited and abused, which they will resent. Sometimes people don't know what the hell happened to them, and just feel confused.
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
A landowner who allows others to farm his fields. -Apex- :)