answersLogoWhite

0

the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who held supreme power in a crisis in rome?

the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)


What type of power did the emperor wield?

It depends on the "emperor" you are talking about. The emperor of Byzantium, or the Greek Eastern Empire, ruled a sophisticated state with many of the same powers and privileges as the ancient Roman emperors. The German emperors of the Latin West aspired to similar prestige, but ruled over a far more fractious polity and had to compete with powerful feudal barons for control of their realm.


Was Julius Caesar a hero or villon?

Both Because...Good.He was a great leader because he made Rome better, conquered lots of places for Rome, he had great controlling power, he was intelligent, and ambitions.Bad.He invested with supreme authority during a crisis. So he set himself as a dictator.


What was not a power held by Rome's emperors?

The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.


Who challenged octavian for the right of rome?

Marc Antony was the one who challenged Octavian for supreme power.


How ancient rome is the supreme example for politics?

Ancient Rome is not the supreme example for politics.


Did rome have a Supreme Court?

Ancient Rome did not have a Supreme Court in the modern sense. However, it had a complex legal system with various courts and magistrates overseeing different types of cases. The highest judicial authority was the Senate, which could influence legal decisions, and the Emperor often held ultimate judicial power. Legal decisions were also guided by the Twelve Tables and later legal codes, but there was no singular court akin to a Supreme Court as we understand it today.


What did a Roman emperor do?

hope this helps: The roman emperor lead the country and took contol in making the difficult decisions. they helped keep the the country in order. They made laws and kept the country at peace.


Were the 2012 Olympics held in rome?

No, the 2012 Olympics were not held in Rome.


What problems do you think might arise during a crisis if they executive power of the us government was held by three people?

If the executive power was held by three people, a crisis would be a very hectic time. There would be a lot of disagreement over what to do. Ultimately one person holding the executive power would be most efficient because he or she would just direct people on what to do as opposed to people arguing or debating over whats best. In a certain sense, a three part executive might develop much as ancient Rome did when three generals were appointed to rule the empire.


Who would lead Rome in time of crisis or war?

In times of crisis or war, Rome would typically be led by a general or military commander, often a consul, who held significant authority over military matters. During the Republic, the Senate could appoint a dictator with absolute power for a limited time to address emergencies. In the Imperial period, the emperor would assume command, wielding both political and military authority to direct Rome's response to threats. This centralized leadership was crucial for maintaining order and responding effectively to challenges.


What supreme general of the emperors army?

The supreme general of the emperor's army, often referred to as the "commander-in-chief" or "imperial general," held the highest military authority in ancient empires, such as in Rome or China. This position was responsible for strategic planning, leading troops in battle, and ensuring the defense of the empire. In Rome, for example, the title was often held by a consul or a general with imperium, while in China, the title could vary but was typically associated with the highest-ranking military officials in the imperial court. The role was crucial for maintaining the power and stability of the empire.