answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who held supreme power in a crisis n rome?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who held supreme power in a crisis in rome?

the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)


What type of power did the emperor wield?

It depends on the "emperor" you are talking about. The emperor of Byzantium, or the Greek Eastern Empire, ruled a sophisticated state with many of the same powers and privileges as the ancient Roman emperors. The German emperors of the Latin West aspired to similar prestige, but ruled over a far more fractious polity and had to compete with powerful feudal barons for control of their realm.


Was Julius Caesar a hero or villon?

Both Because...Good.He was a great leader because he made Rome better, conquered lots of places for Rome, he had great controlling power, he was intelligent, and ambitions.Bad.He invested with supreme authority during a crisis. So he set himself as a dictator.


What was not a power held by Rome's emperors?

The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.


Who challenged octavian for the right of rome?

Marc Antony was the one who challenged Octavian for supreme power.


How ancient rome is the supreme example for politics?

Ancient Rome is not the supreme example for politics.


What did a Roman emperor do?

hope this helps: The roman emperor lead the country and took contol in making the difficult decisions. they helped keep the the country in order. They made laws and kept the country at peace.


Were the 2012 Olympics held in rome?

No, the 2012 Olympics were not held in Rome.


What problems do you think might arise during a crisis if they executive power of the us government was held by three people?

If the executive power was held by three people, a crisis would be a very hectic time. There would be a lot of disagreement over what to do. Ultimately one person holding the executive power would be most efficient because he or she would just direct people on what to do as opposed to people arguing or debating over whats best. In a certain sense, a three part executive might develop much as ancient Rome did when three generals were appointed to rule the empire.


When were the Rome games held?

IN Rome


What was the period in Rome where there was a weak senate and one man held most of the power over Roman citizens?

The Principate.


Who is the supreme god of rome?

Jupiter