The Roman chain of command had some layers that may seem odd to us. Ultimately, during the republic, the senate was in command of the armies. Ultimately, during the principate, the ruling emperor was in command of the armies. However, if a governor of a province had legions stationed there, he was in command of them, even though each legion had a commander called a legate. For example, when the Senate authorized Julius Caesar to take five legions in Gaul, those legions were either newly recruited, or taken from another province. The commanders of the legions, the legates, would still be in command of their legion, but they, in turn, would take their orders from Caesar.
He was unable to pay their wages
In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.In the Roman army there were eight men in a "contubernium". In the late empire there were ten.
NO he did not. He was a noble man and was a retired army chief before Julius. He took the role of the commander in chief to protect rome from Julius
If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.If a deserter from the Roman army were found, he was flogged and then crucified. Roman soldiers were the only citizens who could be crucified.
Yes, extremely. There was no greater honour in the Roman Empire than to serve it. The army embodied this principle in the highest manner.
The praefectus castrorum or camp prefect was the third most senior commander of the ancient Roman legion.
He was the first Roman army commander to invade England which he did in 54BC and 55BC.
If you were a victorious Roman commander you had the lions share of the loot from your conquest. Being a victorious commander was also a step up the political ladder for some and a source of wealth and social prestige for others.
The army commander commanded the army. This was nominally the Pharoah. Sometimes he appointed an army commander to take to the field in his place.
No, there is no rank of commander in the Army. In the Army commander is a title, not a rank. In the Navy, there is a rank of Commander, it is the equivalent of Lt Colonel or O-5.
General George Washington was commander of the Continental Army.
Commander Morgan
No, not quite. A Roman legion is a part of a Roman army. However at certain times and under certain conditions a "legion" could be considered the actual army. For example, if there was a need for a river crossing, a legion would be sent in to build a bridge and it would be said that the "army" built the bridge. It's all a matter of words. Generally, though, an army consisted of several legions under one commander.
No. Commander is a job title (e.g., Company Commander, Battalion Commander, Brigade Commander, Division Commander, Corps Commander, etc.), but not a rank. Lieutenant Commander and Commander exist as ranks only in the Navy. Lieutenant Commander is equivalent to a Major in the Army, Air Force, and Marines, and Commander is equivalent is Lieutenant Colonel in the Army, Air Force, and Marines.
There were hundreds of them - remembering that Brigadiers were of General rank. General-in-Chief of the Union armies in the final year of the war was Ulysses Grant. General-in-Chief of the Confederate armies in the final weeks of the war (a newly-created post) was Robert E. Lee.
Gorge Washington was selected to be the commander in chief (the leader) of the continital army.
The commander in chief is also the commander of the army.