Yes, because "Roman" is a proper adjective, a "name word" and the adjective must agree with it's noun, in this case the word Emperor, which is also a name word.
That could be the case.....
One factor that did not contribute to the fall of the Roman Empire was Christianity. Some pagan Romans thought that Christianity had weakened the empire by eroding the fighting fibre of the Romans. This was not the case. When the roman state recognised Christianity, the empire regained political stability and attained a sense of religious unity among the majority of the population of the empire, which was Christian. The Great Persecution of the Christians unleashed by emperor Diocletian in 303 created widespread social unrest which was destabilising for the empire. This led Galerius, an emperor who took part in the Great Persecution, to issue his Edict of Toleration (of Christianity) in 311 to restore the stability of the empire.
Roman ideology refers to the ideology of the ancient Roman civilisation.
The Emperor Theodosius I at his death in 395. There had been earlier periods of partition, but henceforth there would be two Empires until the end of the Western Empire in 476. The Eastern Empire survived (as what we generally call the Byzantine Empire) until 1453.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
Paul the Apostle was not actually imprisoned in Rome. He was met with hostility at the Temple in Jerusalem because of his teachings. He had to escape the crowd to save his life and gave himself voluntarily to Roman custody. He was due to appear before a Jewish court, but a plot to kill him was discovered. He was transferred to Caesarea for his safety. He was in prison there for two years. The case was reopened. He was due to be sent back to Jerusalem for a trial. However, he asked to appeal to the emperor. This is why he was sent to Rome. He sent two years under house arrests. The contemporary sources did not say how he died.
Appeal the decision of the court.
Traffic case
An appeal that occurs before the underlying case has been completely resolved.
Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.Ideally, when an emperor died, the new emperor was designated as heir in the dead emperor's will. However, the ideal was not always the case and disputes, civil wars, and even double claims to be emperor occurred.
If it affected the outcome of the case, you can appeal the case.
a case comes to a court if they have a final ruling then they can. If the person in the case is not happy with the results they can get an appeal and go to a higher case but its rare that people get an appeal.
No. The US Supreme Court is the final court of appeal; if they deny your case, the decision of the lower court stands. There is no other avenue of appeal.
Paul's Case was created in 1905.
Once a case is decided you can begin the appeal process immediatley.
No, Spartacus was not a Roman Emperor. Spartacus was a Thracian, possibly a soldier who was either captured by a Roman Legion or served as an Auxilliary in a Roman Legion, was enslaved either for failure to served appropriatedly as an Auxilliary or because he had been captured, and trained as a Gladiator. He initiated a slave rebellion within the Roman Republic known as the Third Servile War, in an apparent attempt to escape Roman territory. There were no Roman Emperors at the time, since it was the Roman Republic and not the Roman Empire whom he rebelled against. Spartacus rebellion occur in the late phases of the Roman Republic, & just prior to the Roman Empire. There would not be a de facto Roman Emperor until Julius Ceasar who was technically Dictator for Life, a position contrary to the constitutional framework of the Roman Republic. Julius was the last executive of the Roman Republic. There would not be a de jure Roman Emperor until Octavius Ceasar, better not as Augustus Ceasar, terminated the Roman Republic and initiated the Roman Empire. Augustus was the first executive of the Roman Empire. Augustus established the Principate phase of the Roman Empire which had some vestiges of the Roman Republic; this was not the case in the Dominate phase of the Roman Empire.