0
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
The Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Vivi
Taiga
JordanThe Romans elected two consuls for a couple of reasons, one being that they did not want to give one man complete power, The only exception to this was the dictator who was appointed and not elected. Another reason was that with two consuls they could be assured of having at least one of them acting for the people in Rome, in case the other was away leading an army against an enemy as a consul was also a military leader.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In times of crisis who did the Romans choose to lead the city?
During the period of the Roman Republic, there were two heads of state called consuls. They were elected for a one-year term and each had veto power over the other. However, during periods of crisis they could nominate a dictator who had absolute power for the duration of the crisis.
How long did the roman consuls rule their territory?
Consuls did not rule a territory. They ruled the empire. A consul was the highest elected official in the Roman republic and held office for one year. After his term as consul, he was often given a province to govern, again for a period of one year, although in many cases this was extended.
How many members were in the roman consul?
If you mean the Roman consuls, the political office, there were two consuls who served for one year.
Who led the government and commanded the army in the roman republic?
During the republic the government was headed by the consuls. They also commanded the army, but other officials, called praetors, could also raise and command an army. Governors of provinces also had this right.
What are the three parts of the Roman government?
Thee were not three parts of the Roman government. During the period of the monarchy the king was in charge of the government. The senate was an advisory body for the king. It was not an elected body and was not part of the government. The king appointed the senators. There were also two popular assemblies; the Assembly of the Soldiers and the Assembly of the Tribes (the districts). During the 482-year period of the Roman Republic the king was replaced by two annually elected consuls who were the heads of the Republic. As the republic developed, four more types of elected officers of state were created: the censors (who carried out the census, enrolled the senators, commissioned public works and oversaw public morality), the praetors (the chief justices), the aediles (who performed many administrative functions) and the quaestors (the treasures). However, the republic did not have a centralised system of government, like a cabinet or an administration. The consuls were not in charge of the other officers of state and each officer acted independently within the remit of their office. The senate continued to be an advisory body. It debated policy matters and influenced policy decisions. However, it was not involved in governance. The popular assemblies voted on bills and elected the officers of state. During the 503-year period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers. The government was their court and their bureaucracy. The power of the senate was curtailed. The officers of state became the appointees of the emperor. The consuls were reduced to ceremonial functions. The popular assemblies were either scrapped or emasculated.
