They wanted to have more rights and to chose those rights themselves.
The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
The people of ancient Rome were able to change their government by civil protest or civil unrest. They overthrew the kings, established the republic (which even worked for a while) and finally, when the republic faded out, consented to the principate.
The patricians changing the form of government refers to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the republic. The Romans overthrew the last king, Taquinius Superbus, in a rebellion because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the function of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in their hands. That the king was overthrown by the patrician aristocracy is an assumption, rather than a proven fact. Not enough is known about the events for this to be an established fact. For example, the leader of the revolt and the mastermind of the creation of the republic, Lucius Junius Brutus, was a plebeian. Moreover, 21% of the consuls in the first 26years of the Republic were plebeians.
The Law of the Twelve Tablets did not change the form of Roman government. It was compiled in 451 BC and 450 BC; That is, 58 and 59 years into the Roman Republic which lasted for 482 years (509 BC-27 BC)
They wanted to have more rights and to chose those rights themselves.
they didn't its went monarchy government dictatorship.
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.The government of ancient Rome went from a monarchy, to a republic, to a principate.
After 200 years of harsh rule by kings, the people wanted more of a role in government.
Changes can be from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, a republic to a democracy or a dictatorship to a communist state. These are just some forms of government, there are more and a change in form would be from one to another
The romans made a republic in which the people elected their leaders with no head of the empire
Rome became a republic in order to give all citizens a voice in their government. They would no longer put up with the arbitrary rules of a king.
They did not, it happened the other war round, Rome started out as a republic ruled by the senate, then after Julius Caesar (who refused to be king/emperor when this was offered to him), Rome became a monarchy ruled by an emperor. Because they were "uncomfortable" with monarchy. That is my opinion, though. Hope that helps :) Actually Rome had just less than seven kings when it was born, then it became a republic until its end. They had consoles, senators and democracy but it was an empire. Rome wasnt governed by a king or emperor per se, but by senators although the emperor had more powers than nowaddays presidents.
Because the monarchy was corrupt and ruled by insane people and they began to see how this was not a good way to run an empire.
The period of the monarchy was not a period of harsh rule. All the monarchs but one were benign rulers. It was only the last king who was a tyrant. He was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy and create a republic to prevent the return of tyranny . This was the purpose of the republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they cloud counterbalance each other. The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
A republic was established and the monarchy when a republic was abolished following a constitutional referendum in 1973. The monarchy was also abolished during the Second Hellenic Republic (1924-1935).