answersLogoWhite

0

I'm sure that the citizens of Rome were relatively happy, but the slaves that might be slain without cause could not have been very happy.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would people in the Roman Empire have been happy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Why were some Romans happy to be conquered by the Huns?

The Huns did not conquer the Roman Empire. They raided the eastern part of the empire three times, tried to invade Gaul but were repelled, and tried to invade to Italy, but had to give up because of a famine in Italy and because the Roman army attacked their homeland. It was said that some Gallo-Romans did not mind the conquests by the Germanic peoples because they were unhappy with the Roman state's oppressive taxation regime.


What happend when the roman empire the republic collapsed?

in the colosseum there were gladitorial fights. it was a football staduim and it was a race track, there was performances such as the gladiators. it was filled with millions of people watching the events.games in rome today are known as the bloodiest exhibtitions of puplic entertainment. Ally: Ok i was searching this up too so i dont have the answer sorry.. but the person who answered that for you well they didnt even give you the answer they told you what happened in it not what happened when the empire fell.


Why were some Romans happy about being conquered be the Huns?

The Romans were not conquered by the Huns. The Huns settled north of the river Danube, part of the border of the Roman empire. They carried out many raids south of that river, but did not make any conquests there. They tried to invade Gaul, but they were defeated and repelled by a combined army of Romans, Franks, and Visigoths. Soon after this, the Hun empire disintegrated.


Who was the first roman emporer?

augustusAnswerOctavianus... later called Caesar Augustus is considered as the first roman emperor. Please note that the most famous roman leader, Julius Caesar had chosen Augustus as his own son. Julius Caesar himself doesn't really count as emperor... he had been blaimed for concentrating the leading positions is one person (himself). If by "empire" the word commonly used for the principate, Octavian/Augustus was the first ruler.True AnswerThe first ruler of the Roman empire was Romulus. You can disagree with me if you think that your smarter than a collage prep. middle school textbook.


What was the immediate cause of the fall of the Roman empire?

Rome fell in 410 BC with the invasion of the Barbarian tribes. When the Visigoths took Rome the empire was done. This set in motion a 1000 years of chaos since the Roman government kept all the roads, bridges, and government/military intact. With this gone no one had any protection or services. People had to fend for themselves to survive , so little kingdoms and serfdom's were created and people depended them for protection and services. It was a very dark time in Europe and it wasn't until the Crusades that Europe started to come out of it.