The five issues that causes this conflict was:
Economic and social differences between the North and the South.
States versus federal rights.
The fight between Slave and Non-Slave State Proponents
Growth of the Abolition Movement.
The election of Abraham Lincoln.
Our founding fathers brushed aside the topic of slavery and left it for Lincoln's generation to resolve.
the lead of the civil war was slavery
The well-meant attempt to put the slavery question to a local vote in each new state. When they tried it in Kansas, the voters were intimidated by mounted terrorists from outside the state. This demonstrated that the slavery question was likely to spark a war.
John Flinken caused the conflict
The main reason for the Civil War was the right of secesion. The north began to put tighter and tighter restraints upon slavery in new territories and new states. The south feared this trend would lead to their votes being worthless, as new states would be anti-slavery. The right of the state to govern itself led the southern states to secede from the union. Slavery was the catalyst that lit the powder keg. There were many underlying causes that were building up as the 1850s came to a close the 1860s began. There are many who say that slavery was the main issue and that is not true. It was a very large contributing factor and arguably the main underlying cause of the southern states to evoke their ability to secede from the union. And remember, President Lincoln's main cause for going to war was to preserve the union. If he could have done so by leaving slavery intact, he would have done so. The politically correct, and smart thing to say is that I am going to war to preserve the union because saving the union first, is of higher priority. You don't cut off your nose to spite you face. Lincoln did fight the Civil War too end the evil of slavery.
Tecumseh
The south wanted to keep slavery to keep their economy going as opposed to doing the right thing and setting salves free. This is how the conflict started!
The Wilmot Proviso lead to conflict because it specifically says that no slavery is allowed in any parts of Mexico.
The conflict over slavery in the United States fueled sectionalism by deepening the divide between the North and the South. The differing views on slavery's morality and its impact on the economy and society created distinct regional identities and priorities. This ultimately led to the breakdown of national unity and the eruption of the Civil War.
many northerners believed that southerners wanted to take territory from Mexico in order to extend slavery
many northerners believed that southerners wanted to take territory from Mexico in order to extend slavery
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 led to widespread violence in the Kansas Territory between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act allowed the settlers to decide through popular sovereignty whether Kansas would allow slavery, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery in the lead-up to the Civil War.
the lead of the civil war was slavery
The national response to the Attack on Lawrence in 1856, which was part of the "Bleeding Kansas" conflict, was mixed. President Franklin Pierce initially viewed the incident as a local issue and did not intervene. However, the attack helped to further highlight the tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States, contributing to the lead-up to the Civil War.
Debate over slavery can lead to conflict in the future by deepening divisions within society, creating tensions between different groups with conflicting beliefs and interests. Failure to address the underlying issues and reach a consensus can result in social unrest, protests, and even violence as each side tries to assert its position and challenge the opposing perspective. Additionally, unresolved debates can impact political structures and policies, leading to further friction and possible destabilization within a country or community.
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, which threatened the balance of power between slave and free states in the U.S. They believed it went against their rights to bring slaves into new territories and feared it could lead to the restriction of slavery in existing states.
The civil war
new land, money, resources