The US regulations at the time said that each company (100 men) would have two musicians. Typically one was a fifer and one was a drummer. This means that for every regiment (10 companies), there should be a total of 20 musicians, about 50:50 between fifers and drummers, and one Drum Major who led the field music.
That depends on what you mean by the question.
The US Army still (to this day) has Marching Bands, and continues to have drummers in such marching bands.
However, your question seems to be whether the US Army continued to use juveniles as musicians after the Civil War.
An act passed by Congress on June 30, 1864 prohibited the enlistment of any minor under the age of 16. During the last months of the Civil War, therefore, it as illegal to enroll a youngster as a drummer or in any other capacity. There is substantial evidence that this law was not enforced during the last portion of the Civil War (probably most recruiting officers were unaware of it).
After the war, a small number of minors enlisted in the US Army as musicians throughout the 1870's and 1880's (of course, there would have been individuals who misrepresented their ages, but I am talking about individuals who were acknowledged to be underage). John Urquhart joined the 14th US infantry in 1881, at age 15, and served for five years. Thomas Conlin joined the 21st US infantry, also in 1881, at age 14 and served for 5 years. These were two of the last acknowledged juveniles to serve in the US Army (or in any branch of the US armed forces)
The drummer boys also fought. One boy named Johnny Clem ran away from home in 1861 when he was 11 years old and enlisted. The twenty-second Michigan Regiment took him as a drummer paying him 13.00 a month for his service. At the battle of Shiloh Clem earned the name " Johnny Shiloh" when a cannon shell bounced off a tree stump and destroyed his drum. When another drum was shattered in battle, Clem found a musket and fought the rest of the war. He became a sergeant in the fall of 1863. If you want to read more about the boys of the Civil War get the book the "Boys War" by Jim Murphy.
the drummer boys were the ones who gave the emotion during the battle.
Drummer boys were used to send messages to the soilders.
No. The troops were young men and boys. The boys were drummer boys, but many did fight as well.
Drummer boys were used to help with communicating commands to front line soldiers.
Civil war drummer boys were very important. They sent signals with their drums. With out the drummer boys the soldiers would have a harder time figuring out what a higher ranked officer needed them to do? Anything else you need? -A
No, drummer boys of the civil war did not carry weapons. All they did is drum.
the drummer boys were the ones who gave the emotion during the battle.
Drummer boys were used to send messages to the soilders.
By being drummer boys
No. The troops were young men and boys. The boys were drummer boys, but many did fight as well.
Drummer boys were used to help with communicating commands to front line soldiers.
ok, drummer boys and buglers were helpful because they made military signals with their instruments.
Drummer boys were used to send messages to the soilders.
beat the drum to keep the troops in formation
beat the drum to keep the troops in formation
Hi, I am doing a report on civil war drummer boys. I have reserched a lot and have found that during the civil war drummer boys sometimes didn't even have uniforms. Some wore what ever they had. Others, wore left over uniforms that usually did not fit. If you have any questions i would be glad to answer them! For other boys it depended on the side they were fighting for.
Civil war drummer boys were very important. They sent signals with their drums. With out the drummer boys the soldiers would have a harder time figuring out what a higher ranked officer needed them to do? Anything else you need? -A