The Civil War was a war between two different economic STYLES, not two economies. Both the North and the South were fighting to protect aspects of their economies that they saw as necessary for their way of life to be upheld.
North
South
Chat with our AI personalities
Economics played a tremendous role in the US Civil War. The Union had more economic resources than the Confederacy. The Union was able to successfully blockade major Confederate ports, thus cutting the South off on foreign trade.
The South was certain that the previously strong demand for cotton by Great Britain would bring in more money. As it was, the British were in a sluggish economy and it's demand for Southern cotton was reduced.
The industrial Union was able to produce more necessary products to fight the War than the South. The Union was able to tax a larger tax base to help it provide adequate supplies to conduct the War.
The Austro-Prussian War or Seven Weeks' War (in Germany also known as German War, Unification War, Prussian-German War, German Civil War or Fraternal War) was a war fought in 1866
Total war was General Sherman's strategy. He was to use total war to destroy the resources of the south. I am also a civil war expert so you can trust my answer.
Yes He Was in the Civil War. He Was also the First to get the Confederate Medal the Highest there was.
In the English Civil War of the 1600s the Royalists were also called Cavaliers, and the Parliamentary (and Puritanical) forces were called Roundheads. There were no Royalists in the US Civil War.
Civil War