Probably would've lasted a year or two longer. But otherwise no difference, other than having no "dog-fighting" stories to talk about. The war ended because there was becoming a manpower shortage for the combatants...thats why a truce was called; an armistice is a truce.
The lack of tanks would've extended the war time-wise because the trenches wouldn't have been broken.
Impact of Airplanes in the World WarsThey did not have much or enough impact on world war 1 because you could say they were still in experimental stages. In the 20 years that followed a lot of countries sought to improve the airplanes and airforces because they realized the impact it could have on a battlefield. In World War II they had a massive impact; Germany and Japan suffered from the power of the planes more than any other countries. Airplanes could destroy any target seen; other planes, ships, tanks, buildings, bunkers etc. Also, the combined allied airforce ran into the hundreds of thousands, so they would not produce that many if they were not having an impact. The American airforce alone had around 85,000 aircraft and 8,500,000 men during World War II.
While German implements of war were engineered well and well manufactured, they were perhaps a little TOO finely engineered. They ran well, had better capability than any other tanks, but they required too much maintenance. The desert sand wore at the finely machined mechanisms and since the German tanks were engineered to be so tight, the tanks failed as the parts wore or were blocked with sand. The Germans continued to engineer the way they did everything else, they were rigid perfectionists and could never acknowledge that their ways needed to be changed. If you go to the Smithsonian Air and Space museum, you'll be able to see a German fighter airplane alongside a U.S. fighter airplane of the same vintage. The Germans had done the same thing with their airplanes. The United States manufacturing machine would push out far more airplanes than did the Germans. Which would be better? More airplanes that were lighter and cheaper and disposable, or fewer airplanes that comming off the assembly line and required maintenance at a far higher rate?
Mechanics during WW2 maintained and repaired a wide variety of machines such as jeeps , trucks , tanks and airplanes . Repairs would/could consist of , brake replacement , engine overhauls , transmission repairs , diagnosing and repair of a wide variety of mechanical/electrical components . They repaired jeeps , Sherman tanks , 2 1/2 ton trucks , P51 Mustang fighter aircraft as well as numerous other machines .
When tanks first started seeing combat in World War I, it was unclear for what purpose they should be used. They were thrown into battle by the British without much planning on what they would do. Additionally, since they were brand new technology, they had a tendency to not function well. They often suffered mechanical failures. Oftentimes the ventilation was poor, and the crews inside would pass out or even die from engine exhaust. The armor could be penetrated by some German guns, and the tanks were very slow moving (only about as fast as a normal man walks!). However, these early failures led to revised thinking and designing towards tanks. Tanks were built in different styles, some for speed, others to be slow but with powerful guns, and breakthrough tactics began to form- heavy tanks would blow apart enemy lines, and light tanks could rush in to exploit the hole. This would eventually lead to the development of blitzkrieg and other combined arms tactics during the interwar period.
A wagoner in WW1 would be equal to a "truck driver" in WW2. Army trucks replaced wagons, and tanks replaced horses in the army.
you would here gun fire,airplanes,bombs,tanks,and submarines.
without airplanes we wouldn't go to the places we want. and it is important to business people because they travel a lot. without airplanes the world is nothing
Well, we can't say that life would be impossible because there used to be no airplanes. However, life without airplanes would be very hard. There are a lot of busy people in the world these days that are constantly traveling long distances. There are also a lot of ordered goods that are needed immediately that are transported by airplane in a matter of hours. Things would be very difficult without airplanes, I can't even imagine it!
Without steel there would be no cars, motorcycles,boats, or airplanes.
They had airplanes, and other motorized vehichles. But not up to the standards of today they would have been more simple aircrafts and machinery.
They are important because if we didn't have them then we wouldn't be able to ride in airplanes. Airplanes are used for many important things such as shipping goods, transporting people, and in war and without pilots their would be no airplanes flying.
Without steel there would be no cars, motorcycles, boats, or airplanes or ect….
It is bauxite that is the ore of aluminum. Without aluminum, our society wouldn't look anything at all like it does now. Airplanes are made primarily of aluminum. Imagine a world without planes.
Your pet fish wouldn't have a place to live
Two things that make it possible for explorers to travel around the world are airplanes and boats. Without these two things it would be impossible to reach the remote areas of the world.
Without steel there would be no cars, motorcycles, boats, or airplanes or ect….
then you won;t know what an airplane is and use a coach to another country