the publishing process for online material is not always rigorous.
Wikipedia says "Granite for the wall came from Bangalore, Karnataka, India and was deliberately chosen because of its reflective quality." Though are no sources for this information.
Using different types of sources you can have a close guess to what medival villages looked like. For example, aerial photography, written sources(E.G.diaries), illustrations, and etc. All these types of sources, but as a historian, you will need to use a few, but different types of sources to confirm!!
Sources would tell you a little less then one million. Except there were a lot more because back then they didnt have the resources we did today.
Sexual assault, repeated rapes, severe beatings, according to web sources.
coal, oil, water,electricity, steam.
Primary sources, such as original research studies, official government documents, and eyewitness accounts, should be carefully examined for credibility as they provide firsthand information on a particular topic without interpretation or bias from other sources. It's important to evaluate the source of the primary information and consider how it was collected, analyzed, and if it aligns with other reputable sources.
The four criteria used to evaluate sources when writing are credibility, relevance, accuracy, and currency. Credibility assesses the reliability of the source, relevance looks at the information's applicability to the topic, accuracy considers the validity of the information presented, and currency examines how up-to-date the information is.
Evaluate the sources and see if the authors are biased :) -Apex-
Not all sources of information are accurate or reliable. It's important to critically evaluate the credibility, expertise, and potential biases of the source before accepting the information as true. Cross-referencing with other reputable sources can help verify the accuracy of the information.
because the publishing process for online materail is not always rigous exmaple
When you cannot find any other sources that supports its arguments.
To evaluate a source's credibility, consider factors such as the author's expertise and credentials, the publication or website where the information is found, the presence of references or citations, and potential biases or conflicts of interest. It is also helpful to cross-reference the information with other reliable sources to verify accuracy.
To examine a source's credibility, consider factors such as the author's expertise on the topic, the source's reputation and publication date, and the presence of citations and references. Evaluate the source's objectivity, potential bias, and its alignment with other reputable sources. Look out for red flags like sensational language, lack of supporting evidence, and a lack of peer review.
They should be used carefully because, they are natural resources and they are scarce.
To establish the credibility of online sources, you can: Verify the author's credentials and expertise. Check for references and citations to reputable sources. Evaluate the website's domain (.edu, .gov, .org are typically more reliable). Look for recent updates and ensure the information is current and accurate.
When evaluating sources, consider factors such as the credibility of the author or organization, the accuracy and currency of the information, the objectivity and bias in the content, and whether the source is peer-reviewed or from a reputable publication. Cross-referencing with other sources can also help verify the reliability of the information.
One way to evaluate the effectiveness of researching information from a text is by assessing the relevance and accuracy of the information to your research question or topic. You can also consider the credibility of the sources cited in the text and evaluate how well the information supports your arguments or conclusions. Additionally, examining the depth and breadth of the information presented in the text can help you gauge its effectiveness for your research purposes.