The Great Debate. I think..
(New respondent)
Popular Sovereignty
No most northerners did not like popular sovereignty because it violated the Missouri compromise. The South was in favor of popular sovereignty because it allowed the people to decide if slavery would be allowed in a new territory.
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
in WWII they were only allowed 1 egg each weer
The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed states to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, which was controversial because of the slavery issue. Many people didn't want to allow it anywhere, and others wanted to promote and enforce it everywhere.
Answer this question… Though huge numbers of people were killed, no country managed to conquer much territory.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
People in certain areas often determine whether or not their territory allows slavery based on cultural norms, ethical beliefs, economic factors, and legal frameworks. Historical events, social movements, and political decisions also play a significant role in shaping the stance on slavery within a particular region.
it divided the remainder of the Louisiana purchase into two territories and allowed people in each territory to decide on the question of slavery
The correct term is the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed residents in those territories to decide the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty.
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. The people who lived in these territories would be able to vote on whether slavery would be allowed there. What effect did this have on Kansas?
The Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted to the Union as a free state on September 9, 1850. The Utah Territory and the New Mexico Territory were formed by the Compromise of 1850 and these two territories could permit or prohibit slavery as a local option (popular sovereignty).
No. It was a compromise in the Congress to work out problems between some states as to which side they were on. People could not decide on their own to own slaves. Some people in the South didn't want slavery.
Stephen Douglas was a strong supporter of popular sovereignty, which allowed people in each territory to decide for themselves whether to permit slavery. He also believed in infrastructure development, expansion of railways, and economic growth. Additionally, he advocated for the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which repealed the Missouri Compromise and allowed for the possibility of slavery in new territories.
No most northerners did not like popular sovereignty because it violated the Missouri compromise. The South was in favor of popular sovereignty because it allowed the people to decide if slavery would be allowed in a new territory.