No most northerners did not like popular sovereignty because it violated the Missouri compromise. The South was in favor of popular sovereignty because it allowed the people to decide if slavery would be allowed in a new territory.
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
in WWII they were only allowed 1 egg each weer
The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed states to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, which was controversial because of the slavery issue. Many people didn't want to allow it anywhere, and others wanted to promote and enforce it everywhere.
Answer this question… Though huge numbers of people were killed, no country managed to conquer much territory.
Under popular sovereignty, the decision on whether slavery would be allowed in a territory is typically made by the residents of that territory through a vote or referendum. This allows the people living in the area to determine the status of slavery based on majority rule.
Under popular sovereignty, the residents of the territory would ultimately decide whether slavery would be allowed. This principle meant that the people living in a particular territory would determine their own laws and institutions, including the decision on the legality of slavery.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
According to the idea of popular sovereignty, the residents of a territory would decide whether slavery would be allowed through a vote or referendum. The principle is based on the belief that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the consent of the people living in that area.
Popular sovereignty-_-Apex
The correct term is the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed residents in those territories to decide the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty.
The theory promoted by Stephen Douglas was popular sovereignty. This theory allowed the people of a territory to decide for themselves whether to allow or forbid slavery when they applied for statehood, as outlined in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
it divided the remainder of the Louisiana purchase into two territories and allowed people in each territory to decide on the question of slavery
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
Stephen Douglas proposed the idea of popular sovereignty, which allowed residents in each territory to vote on whether or not to allow slavery. He believed this approach would prevent the federal government from imposing its views on the territories and let the residents decide for themselves.