Eisenhower Doctrine
After the fantastic loss of life in World War I the free peoples were willing to accept almost anything in order to avaoid another war. Since they did not realize just how evil and megalomaniacal Hitler was, they thought (or at least hoped) that by giving in to his various demands, each of which, taken by itself was not wholly unreasonable, that he would eventually be appeased and would not make further demands. Michael Montagne To prevent Hitler from taking over Europe Britain and France adopted the appeasement policy which gave Hitler a little of what he wanted in the hope of appeasing him.
Lebensraum was a critical ideology of NAZI Germany based on the claim that the superior race of Germanic people were being deprived of living space due to border restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles. This policy was used to justify territorial expansion in order to displace inferior races and use the land and resources for the German people.
Based on the deal that Germany made with Lenin, he would pull Russia out of WW 1 if he came to power. He did and this allowed the Germans to basically only fight on the Western Front.
Not sure of your context, but MAD during the cold war referred to Mutually Assured Destruction. It was a deterrence theory that was based on the assumption that neither side would launch an all out nuclear attack because they knew the other side would do the same, thus ensuring that neither side survived.
The policy of appeasement was Lloyd George's response to not declaring war on Germany.
Britain followed a policy of appeasement towards Hitler's Germany primarily to avoid another devastating conflict like World War I. British leaders believed that satisfying some of Hitler's territorial ambitions would maintain peace in Europe and allow Britain to rearm effectively. Additionally, there was a widespread sentiment among the British public and political leaders that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on Germany, leading them to view appeasement as a means to rectify past injustices. Ultimately, this policy was based on a miscalculation of Hitler's ambitions and the belief that he could be negotiated with.
the soviet union would constantly seek to expand
dangerous
I do not support your assumption. Your assumption is based upon few facts.
Standard-based performance is based on the assumption that performance can be measured. It is difficult to objectively measure job performance in many positions.
It is an inference :)
An assumption based on prior experience is when we anticipate a similar outcome or situation based on past encounters or knowledge. This assumption is made without having concrete evidence or information to support it but relies on our past understanding of similar events.
yes
theory
Appeasement was primarily driven by the desire to maintain peace in Europe following the devastation of World War I and the economic turmoil of the Great Depression. Leaders, particularly in Britain and France, believed that conceding to some of Hitler's demands, like the remilitarization of the Rhineland and the annexation of Austria, could prevent another large-scale conflict. Additionally, there was a widespread belief that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on Germany, fostering sympathy for some of Hitler's grievances. Ultimately, this policy was based on a mix of misjudgment about Hitler's ambitions and a hope for stability.
It's totally technology based and assumption(imagination) based