Most historians including E H Carr would be outraged that the term 'inevitable' is being used like this. They feel that no historical event can be labelled 'inevitable'. The Holocaust must be studied in its own terms, without adding labels to it. I would argue that it wasn't anyway, because events that led to Hitler having power to commit such an atrocity were out of his own hands and may not have unfolded as they did if his subordinates had reacted differently.
At some stage in 1941 the regime took a conscious decision. It may have been an obvious part of a wider ideological commitment to rid the world of what the Nazis regarded as "Jewish Bolshevism". Please see the link.
See also Christopher Browning, The Origins of the Final Solution: The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, September 1939-March 1942 University of Nebraska Press 2004
Holocaust victims.
Escape: Children of the Holocaust profiles 7 child Holocaust survivors.
Where did the events of the Holocaust span?
There was no guerilla warfare in connection with the Holocaust.
The ISBN of Is the Holocaust Unique? is 0813336864.
yes, it was by no means inevitable
More inevitable, most inevitable
hitler began the holocaust genocide as the "final solution to the jewish problem" at the end of the war when his capture or assassination was inevitable, he killed his wife, his dog, and himself to die with pride rather than at the hands of the red army (who was the most likely threat to his life)
"It was inevitable that that would happen", "his death was inevitable", "losing that match was inevitable"...
more inevitable, most inevitable
With our score so high, I think that victory is inevitable. Making mistakes is inevitable for human beings.
Are factions inevitable?
death is inevitable
Death is inevitable.
Philosophically speaking, usually "not" is inevitable.
Change is inevitable in life, no matter how hard we try to resist it.
It is inevitable that you will die.