answersLogoWhite

0

In the South, strong beliefs in the the military service

caused some governors to object to their troops' being commanded by officers from other states.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

An exclusive order of military officers that aroused strong democratic opposition?

Society of the Cincinnati


Did union forces lose a lot of good officers to the south?

Yes, during the American Civil War, many skilled officers left the Union to join the Confederate forces, particularly those from Southern states who felt a strong loyalty to their home regions. This included notable figures like Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson, who were highly regarded military leaders. Their departure did create challenges for the Union, as these officers brought valuable experience and knowledge to the Confederate army. However, the Union ultimately adapted and developed its own capable leadership over time.


What was one of the South's main advantages?

One of the South's main advantages during the Civil War was its strong military leadership. Many of the best military officers, such as Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, were from the South and brought significant tactical expertise and experience to their commands. Additionally, the South's familiarity with the terrain and its strong agricultural economy, which provided food and supplies, contributed to its initial successes in the conflict.


Did Aztec have a strong military empire?

Yes, the Aztec Empire had a strong military that played a crucial role in its expansion and maintenance of power. Their military was well-organized, with a focus on conquest and tribute collection from neighboring city-states. Skilled warriors, strategic alliances, and a strong emphasis on military training helped the Aztecs dominate much of Mesoamerica. Additionally, their military success was often tied to religious beliefs, as warfare was seen as a means to honor the gods.


Who commanded army intelligence during World War 2?

The Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff G-2. Between 1941 and 1944 three different officers held the post, contributing to its chaotic performance. As the Army's World War II deputy chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Joseph McNarney, stated the Army G-2 "was always a headache for the War Department and was reorganized continuously and unsuccessfully throughout the war." Although the intelligence end product was superb, the machinery that produced it was beset by disorder. When General George C. Marshall took over as Chief of Staff of the US Army on September 3,1939, the Military Intelligence Division was commanded by a colonel, and consisted of 20 officers, three enlisted men, and 46 civilians. Brigadier General Sherman Miles took over in 1940, and MID expanded rapidly. Though much of the failure of intelligence contributing to Pearl Harbor was directly attributable to Miles, the public scapegoat was Lieutenant General Walter Short, the commander in the Hawaiian Department. Miles was however relieved of his duties with MID in the spring of 1942 and replaced by Maj. Gen. George V Strong, who was the incumbent to February 1944, then Maj. Gen Clayton Bissell February 1944 through the end of the war.