Demands for states' rights were dangerous to the union
Demands for states rights were dangerous to the Union
That most Northerners were not fervently anti-slavery.
Northerners and southerners became more angry with each other.
Northerners who moved to the south for profit oppurtunities were called carpetbaggers.
Demands for states' rights were dangerous to the union
Demands for states rights were dangerous to the Union
Demands for states rights were dangerous to the Union
William Lloyd Garrison
this is off my book so... northerners agreed that congress could not outlaw the slave trade for at least 20 years. after that, congress could regulate the slave trade if it wished. northerners also agreed that no state could stop a fugitive slave from being returned to and owner who claimed that slave.
It was the Wilmot Proviso that declared that there should be no slavery in the new states. This gained support in Congress, and by 1860 most Northerners agreed with it, while tolerating slavery in its traditional heartlands. That was how Lincoln got elected.
Northerners were most pleased that California was admitted as a free state. The south was pleased that the fugitive slave act REQUIRED assistance in capturing runaway slaves or face imprisonment.
He was a thot- Tyson Mayfield of Kansas XDXDXD
To save the cotton revenues.
To end the war.
CHECK OUT MY NEW VIDEO!youtube.com/user/ApplePie
they desired new industrial markets