answersLogoWhite

0

They had to give up the prospect of any new slave-states, and forget their dream of an extended slave empire.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did southern states give up in debates over trade issues?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

The Union Navy enforced to stop trade in Southern seaports.?

a blockade


What was the position of the Southern states on the issue of tariffs?

The Northern states had put an end to the practices, at least officially they did, but most of the Framers from the Northern states were just so opposed to slavery as were some of the Framers from the Southern states too. However many farmers from the Southerns were still financially dependent on slavery and wanted it to be continued, so the Southerners believed that each state had a right to decide on the issues itself.


What is cottonocracy?

Cottonocracy refers to the wealthy class of Southern cotton plantation owners who held significant political, economic, and social power in the antebellum South. This elite group amassed their wealth through the production and trade of cotton, which was the dominant crop in the region. The cottonocracy played a key role in shaping the economy and culture of the South prior to the Civil War.


What was the result of commodore Matthew perry's voyage to japan in 1858?

Japan was pressured to allow trade with the Unites States


Why were Southern states not as progressive as the Northern states?

They were agrarian, not industrial. Also, following the invention of the cotton-gin, which made the cotton-farmers enormously wealthy, they were inclined to put on an affectation of ancient landed nobility, who did not encourage their sons from dirtying their hands in trade or industry. This kept the South even more backward.