0
NATO, SEATO, nor the UN were utilized in the Vietnam War. The war's controversy had affected the members. However, ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand, United States), even though there were some disagreements there to, did take effect. ANZUS, created in '51, called for defense to protect nations in the immediate Pacific area, thus ANZUS responded.
SEATO would've done the same thing, however the SEATO members of Britain, France, and Pakistan refused to deploy troops to Vietnam; thus, again, ANZUS had to hold the line.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Vivi
Fran
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did congress borrow from social security during World War 2?
NO
After world war ii many countries believed in the principle of collective security which means that?
nations should act together to promote peace
Did you need a social security number to join the military during World War 2?
no you dont.
What is the most effective response to aggression-appeasement or collective security?
In the context of World War II, including the years just prior to its outbreak in 1939, the historical record is generally quite clear: the most effective response to the aggression of nations such as Germany and Italy during the 1930s would have been collective security -- galvanized by the will to take military action when necessary. While appeasement proved effective in buying time for Allied preparations for war, it did so at the cost of territorial losses, betrayal of national sovereignty (in the case of Czechoslovakia), and a strengthening of the aggressor-nations.
Were there security cameras in World War 2?
No there where not.
