answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

separate but equal

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the name of the doctrine used by lawmakers and the courts after the CIVIL war that was supposed to symbolize equality between races but in fact enabled segregation of blacks from whitefacilti?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the name of the doctrine used by lawmakers and the courts after the civil war that was supposed to symbolize equality between races but in fact enabled segregation of black from white facility?

"Separate But Equal".


Is separate but equal doctrine an example of segregation?

Yes, it is segregation given the form of law.


What was the supreme courts records in segregation cases in the years before brown v board of education?

Before the segregation cases, the Supreme Court was not on the side of de-segregation. The standing doctrine was the doctrine of separate but equal.


What was the supreme court record in segregation cases in the years before brown v board of education?

Before the segregation cases, the Supreme Court was not on the side of de-segregation. The standing doctrine was the doctrine of separate but equal.


What did brown vs board of education end in?

plessy v. Ferguson was upturned outlawing segregation


What was the doctrine that justified segregation in the facilities used by African Americans and whites in the South?

separate but equal


In Plessy v. Ferguson the Supreme Court?

established separate-but-equal doctrine upholding segregation -scrfc369


What was the Supreme Courts record in segregation cases in the years before Brown v Board of Education?

In the years leading up to Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court had a mixed record on segregation cases. In some instances, it upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal," such as in the 1896 case, Plessy v. Ferguson, which established the "separate but equal" principle. However, there were a few cases, like Sweatt v. Painter (1950) and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950), where the Court began to question the implementation of segregation in higher education. These cases set the stage for the landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.


What was the supreme courts role in legalizing segregation?

The Supreme Court did not play a direct role in legalizing segregation. In fact, the Court issued several significant rulings that challenged and overturned segregation laws. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Court declared "separate but equal" segregation in public schools unconstitutional. However, certain Supreme Court decisions, like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), perpetuated the "separate but equal" doctrine and set the stage for segregation laws. It took many years and additional Supreme Court decisions to dismantle legalized segregation.


How did plessy v Ferguson make the fight against segregation more difficult?

Plessy v Ferguson made the fight against segregation more difficult by establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for the legal segregation of public facilities based on race. This decision legitimized and perpetuated racial segregation, undermining efforts to challenge discriminatory practices and maintain racial inequality for decades to come.


Was plessy vs Ferguson in favor of slavery?

No, the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case was not about slavery. It was a landmark case in 1896 that upheld racial segregation laws, introducing the "separate but equal" doctrine, allowing for legal segregation and discrimination. It maintained racial segregation and laid the groundwork for decades of racial inequality in the United States.


Which man would most likely support Plessy v Ferguson Supreme Court decision that upheld the separate but equal doctrine?

A man who was a supporter of racial segregation would most likely support the Plessy v Ferguson Supreme Court decision. This decision established to "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for racial segregation in public facilities as long as they were considered equal.