It is NOT the "civil war". Slavery was a very minor issue at the start of the war.
wefubfbwubeuebwdge.
Abolitionists pressured Lincoln to end the slavery after the start of the Civil War in 1861. These pressures also affected Lincoln to declare the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.
It was at the end of slavery the start of free enterprise. Where anyone could run their own business and the state had no control.
Middle east
Really the nation wasn't all that divided over slavery at the time of the Articles. There might have been some people in the north who didn't approve of it, but overall slavery wasn't an issue back then. You really start to see slavery become an issue when we start to annex states and territories. the issue of weather we make them slave or free states depending on the Mason Dixon line is a cause of major controversy
Yes, the civil war was started on the issue of slavery.
No.
It is NOT the "civil war". Slavery was a very minor issue at the start of the war.
To get free labor and for big selling profit. Slavery is still an issue today, even in the USA.
wefubfbwubeuebwdge.
wefubfbwubeuebwdge.
Slavery became a larger issue in light of the Civil War starting to begin. However, slavery did not start the Civil War. That came about through many different issues with the economy and state's rights. Slavery was the straw to break the camel's back really.
yes it did all the answers are in a history book and a social studies
The civil war started over "States Rights", not slavery.
The main issues were: for the North to preserve the Union, for the South the States' Rights and Southern Independence.
increasing tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery. The novel depicted the harsh realities of slavery and stirred up anti-slavery sentiments in the North while infuriating Southern slave owners. This heightened polarization over the issue of slavery ultimately played a role in the outbreak of the Civil War.