weewrwrtwrtgwetdertuiu kua wief WEkj kWfh jhgsaer756t8 ryudry4 b w ekwntue fkrfkedglkx oihz EL W eui WZlre :We ti ier g z jsr hk wufu ek i lsuagerert K esu eurs fsjs fskezj uhrh lig zoehf
Chat with our AI personalities
Because it was a slave-state that had pro-Confederate leaders, and could easily have seceded. Also it was on the route between New York and Washington, and could have interrupted the movement of troops and supplies between the two centres.
The war in the west was characterized by large movements of battlefields, consistent union progress, long supply lines, and featured a large number of irregular units of Confederate-aligned raiders. In contrast the war in the east was usually one of very slow movement, fixed fighting positions, little union progress for three years, and large invasions of the north attempted by the Confederates. Nearly all fighting was done by regiments under control of divisions and generals rather than by partisan raiders.
The rather basic, slow moving, under-armed tank. But it could have proved to be a powerful weapon. Unfortunately it was not used properly. Mainly because some generals were still out of touch with modern warfare and still unable to accept more modern weapons and troop movement.
feared the black power movement
A war of movement.