The two sides had the opportunity and the motivation to keep fighting for four years.
The new rifle-barrelled artillery enabled long-range gunnery.
Military medicine was almost non-existent - if you were wounded, you probably died.
The casualties seemed especially high, because America was a young country with a small population.
The majority of casualties other than the obvious war casualties came from being in captivity, starvation, and hypothermia.
The statement means that the Hoods Arm was luckier than any other army because it did not lose many casualties.
The battle cost more brutal than people expected
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
The British had more than 55,000 casualties, and German casualties are estimated at 45,000.
The majority of casualties other than the obvious war casualties came from being in captivity, starvation, and hypothermia.
If you mean what war had the most US casualties is was the Civil War, over 700,000. More than other wars that have happened since combined.
Because, all of the casualties were American, on both sides.
Russia
The US Civil War had more American casualties than any other war; hence the US President in power during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, would have had the most troops die under his administration.
The statement means that the Hoods Arm was luckier than any other army because it did not lose many casualties.
The Civil War killed more people than any other war.
The battle cost more brutal than people expected
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
The British had more than 55,000 casualties, and German casualties are estimated at 45,000.
They both had an impact. ALL wars will influence/impact their respective generations. Naturally, some will impact more than others. The bloodier the war, the more the impact. WWII, for the US, had more casualties than Vietnam, Vietnam had more casualties than Korea, WWII had more US casualties than WWI did. The US Civil War had more casualties than any of our wars (however, we were fighting ourselves, so one must be careful when using those figures). Casualties aside, it may be said that the greatest impact about WWII was when the world entered the "atomic age", on 06 August 1945, when the atomic bomb was used to end WWII. The war however, had been won. Vietnam's impact may have been that it wasn't.