They did - the Missouri Compromise. This lasted thirty years, and was only rendered impractical by the admission of California, a state that extended so far on either side of the Missouri line that both sides claimed it.
If only California could have been admitted as two separate states - North and South - there needn't have been a Civil War.
The Missouri Compromise was very sensible, and deserved to last.
The south just wanted to keep the slaves because that was where the rich lived
Back in 1959, North Vietnam was Communist. Until 1975 when the Americans joined the North and captured the south. Now the whole country is Communist. yes the north was communist and it now entirely communist but the Americas did NOT join the north. they went into the south to protect them from the communist because they were afraid of communist invasion as was seen in cuba with the support of the soviets, the other superpower. it wasnt until after 1975 once all the American troops had left ( referred to as vietnamization) that the North captured the south :)
No, nothing of that sort was even invented, im pretty sure there wasnt even grenades. He's correct they didn't have bazookas in the War Between The States but they did have grenades. The North used Ketchum Grenades and the South used a couple of different designs.
no it wasnt because the Northern Whigs joined with other opponents of slavery.and the north was against slavery yes they were against slavery the democrats were for it
The South wanted more control of their own states. Lincoln did not support this. Also, the South supported slavery, and Lincoln didn't.
no it wasnt
there wasnt 1 there really wasnt 1. they just fought
the great compromise wasnt fair, but it was better than they already had.
one was free one wasnt and they were both African's
your teacher is a liberal, half the colonies would not have joined if there wasnt a compromise on slavery, america probably wouldnt exist. If there hadnt been a compromise then the south would have developed into a country where slavery was completely acceptable instead of what it is now.
it wasnt only confined in the south.
when wasnt the federal government not prepared to dictate to the south
Without including Alaska, about 20% of the USA is North of the Southern most tip of Canada. So I hope this wasnt a serious question.
The significance of the 1820 Missouri Compromise is it probably delayed the War Between the States by 40 years.During this 40 year period, the northern "union" states grew in population, infrastructure, manufacturing and technology. This period allowed the north an advantage in preserving the union.Hypothetically, the outcome of the war could have been very different had it been waged in the 1820 era, when the south had a closer parity with the north, and the United States could well be two countries today.see missouri-compromise-of-1820==It delayed the Civil War long enough that the young nation was strong enough to withstand the shock, instead of disintegrating.
he was planning to end slavery so pro-slavery states started seceding from the union.
learn to except who you are and not view your differences as weakness' it can take a LONG time...years, but its worth it in the end. Understand that everybody wasnt created equal either as part of understanding your differences, you wouldn't be you without your differences..
She is smelly and a drunk !! Never be like her .... she is bad !! xx <3 love you its me harry mwhhahahaahhah ^^^ wasnt me lol funny geog lesson
if rice wasnt omitted from the non-exportation agreement