answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Sources historians can use to find information include: testimony from witnesses; accounts in letters or memoirs; records from courts, businesses, churches, etc.; other books, newspapers; unwritten records; and physical remains.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: A history is a factual narrative or record of past events gathered through observation and outside or secondary sources List the sources historians can use to find information?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

What problems of secondary data quality must researchers face?

Researchers who use secondary sources must make their best efforts to verify the accuracy of the information. For example, a researcher who cites a newspaper article about a court hearing should dig further to verify the information. To do this they may need to get transcripts of the court hearing. It may not always be easy to verify secondary data in research, but every effort must be made in order to prove the credibility of the sources being used in any research. Researchers must also determine the value of secondary sources at times. If no primary sources are available a researcher must use secondary sources. In order to use credible secondary sources and retrieve honest and accurate information a researcher must validate the sources by evaluating them thoroughly. To evaluate secondary sources a researcher must consider the purpose, scope, authority, and audience that the information is based on (Cooper & Schindler, 2006, Ch. 7). Determining these factors will help a researcher choose secondary sources that have strong value. Secondary data is a source that many researchers will have to use at times. Using secondary data as the only available resource can cause problems of verification and credibility. This makes a researcher's job harder. Although the use of secondary resources can bring extra work, it must be done at times. For a researcher to get past the problems of credibility presented by secondary resources a researcher must take steps to verify secondary sources. A researcher must also make well thought out judgments on secondary resources if they want their research to appear credible and valid. Understanding the problems with secondary research data is the first step in determining how to deal with these problems.


Define secondary source?

A written paper or recording presenting information find at another source. It is part of a scholarship, along with a primary source.


How do you know that the image of Abraham Lincoln talking to soldiers is a secondary source?

because abraham lincoln said he want a secondary source


What was the first secondary school in the colonies?

1635 Boston Latin School


What is a prime source?

A primary or prime source (also called original source) is a document, recording or other source of information, such as a paper or a picture for instance, that was created at the time being studied, by an authoritative source, usually one with direct personal knowledge of the events being described. It serves as an original source of information about the topic. Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which often cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources.

Related questions

Which of the followinf describes the advantages that secondary sources have over primary sources of historians?

Secondary sources offer analysis and interpretation of historical events, providing a broader understanding. They also help to corroborate information found in primary sources, adding context and perspective. Additionally, secondary sources can present differing viewpoints and theories, enriching the historical narrative.


What does you do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?

Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.


What tools do historians?

historians use primary soucres and secondary sources


What tools do historians use?

Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.


Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?

secondary


How do historians use primary and secondary sources?

A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.


What describes and advantages for secondary sources have over primary sources historians?

They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. (APEX)


How do historians investigate history?

Present day historians investigate the histories already written by: * checking the resources used by historians who have written about a particular subject; * by investigating any sources that were overlooked; and * searching primary, secondary leads that may bring to light new sources of historical information.


What are the later writings and interpretations of historians and writers often secondary sources like textbooks and articles provide summaries of information found in primary sources?

Later writings and interpretations by historians and writers often analyze and synthesize information from primary sources to provide a broader perspective on historical events or topics. They may offer new insights, perspectives, and interpretations based on the analysis of primary sources, helping to deepen our understanding of the past. Secondary sources like textbooks and articles summarize this information in a more accessible and structured format for a wider audience.


Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate the primary secondary sources they use to answer their question?

to be happy