answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History

How did the periods of Jeffersonian democracy illustrate the idea that democracy is a process rather than a conclusion?

the change in democracy between the two periods shows that it is a process


Why did the caning of Charles summers divide the north and south before the civil war?

The caning of Charles Sumner in 1856 exemplified the escalating tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery. Sumner, a Northern abolitionist senator, was brutally attacked by Southern congressman Preston Brooks after delivering a speech criticizing pro-slavery forces. This violent act shocked many in the North, who viewed it as an assault on free speech and democracy, while the South largely celebrated Brooks as a defender of Southern honor. The incident highlighted the deepening rift between the two regions, intensifying the already existing conflict that would lead to the Civil War.


In 1760's what did Jeremiah Dixon and Charles Mason have to settle?

They had to settle a boundary dispute between Maryland and Pennsylvania


John Locke's concept of checks and balances between divisions of government was elaborated on by?

Charles-Louis de Secondat Montesquieu.


What events led to the outbreak of the English civil war?

The English Civil War (1642-1651) was primarily triggered by tensions between King Charles I and Parliament over issues of governance, taxation, and religion. The king's attempts to rule without Parliament and impose his religious policies, particularly those favoring Anglicanism, alienated many Puritans and Parliamentarians. The immediate catalyst was Charles's decision to arrest five members of Parliament in January 1642, which escalated conflicts and led to armed confrontations. Additionally, social, economic, and regional grievances contributed to the widespread support for the Parliamentarian cause against royal authority.

Related Questions

In what ways did the Charles River Bridge vs Warren Bridge decision contribute to the growth of democracy between 1800 and 1840?

The case affirmed exclusive federal control of interstate commerce.In court, Roger B. Taney ruled that the community's interest preceded trade and commerce. Thus, the Court established the legal concept of contracts and community rights. This contributed to democracy and equality among rich business men and the communities.


In what ways did the Charles river bridge v Warren bridge decision contribute to the growth of democracy between 1800 and 1840?

The case affirmed exclusive federal control of interstate commerce.In court, Roger B. Taney ruled that the community's interest preceded trade and commerce. Thus, the Court established the legal concept of contracts and community rights. This contributed to democracy and equality among rich business men and the communities.


What is the difference between democracy and representative democracy?

Democracy is a system of government where all eligible citizens have a say in decision-making. Representative democracy is a form of democracy where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.


In what ways did each what contribute to the growth of democracy between 1800 and 1840?

grundle butter


What is the main difference between a direct democracy and a representative democracy?

In a direct democracy, citizens directly participate in decision-making, while in a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.


How do direct democracy and representative democracy compare and contrast in terms of decision-making processes and representation of the people?

Direct democracy and representative democracy differ in their decision-making processes and representation of the people. In direct democracy, citizens directly participate in decision-making through voting on laws and policies. In contrast, representative democracy involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Direct democracy provides more direct involvement but can be time-consuming, while representative democracy allows for more efficient decision-making but may lead to potential disconnect between representatives and the people they represent.


What is the distinction between a representative democracy and a direct democracy?

In a representative democracy, people elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, people directly participate in decision-making processes without representatives.


What is the difference between representative and direct democracy?

In a representative democracy, people elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, people directly participate in decision-making processes.


What are the key differences between direct democracy and representative democracy?

Direct democracy involves citizens directly participating in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies. Representative democracy, on the other hand, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In direct democracy, the people have more direct control over decision-making, while in representative democracy, elected officials make decisions on behalf of the people.


What are the differences between direct democracy and representative democracy?

Direct democracy is a system where citizens directly participate in decision-making, such as through voting on laws and policies. Representative democracy, on the other hand, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf.


What is the difference between direct and indirect democracy?

Direct democracy is a system where citizens directly participate in decision-making through voting on laws and policies. Indirect democracy, also known as representative democracy, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf.


What are the similarities between democracy and libertarianism?

everything, libertarianism is democracy and democracy is libertarianism.