answersLogoWhite

0

they think about clues they got when they find artifact's from prehistory that how historians investigate the past.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History

How does bias rule important to historians?

The bias rule is crucial for historians as it encourages them to critically evaluate sources and recognize the inherent biases in historical narratives. By understanding the perspectives and contexts of both the sources and the historians themselves, they can provide a more balanced and nuanced interpretation of events. This awareness helps prevent the distortion of history and promotes a more accurate representation of the past. Ultimately, acknowledging bias enables historians to engage with diverse viewpoints and foster a deeper understanding of historical complexities.


What was the purpose of the warren commission?

to investigate the assassination of president John F Kennedy


What eh carr said about history?

E.H. Carr, a prominent historian, argued that history is not just a collection of facts but a narrative shaped by the interpretations of historians. He emphasized the importance of understanding the context in which historical events occur and how these events are perceived over time. Carr believed that history is a dialogue between the past and the present, with historians playing an active role in interpreting and reconstructing historical narratives. His work highlights the subjective nature of historical analysis and the influence of contemporary values on our understanding of the past.


A history is a factual narrative or record of past events gathered through observation and outside or secondary sources List the sources historians can use to find information?

Sources historians can use to find information include: testimony from witnesses; accounts in letters or memoirs; records from courts, businesses, churches, etc.; other books, newspapers; unwritten records; and physical remains.


Were colonial historians prisoners of their time?

As far as both colonial and nationalist historians are concerned they were prisoners of their time to a larger extent.As both history being influenced by the situation. Colonial historians constructed history to justify colonization while nationalist constructed history to spread nationalism. How ever to a lesser extent both colonial and nationalist historians were not prisoners of their time as they write history using common sense,feelings ,objective and favour.