Throughout the centuries people's attitudes and pratices towards death have changed greatly, due to society changing. This takes into consideration such things as, the change in modern medicine, culture and growth in society today, as going back many centuries, it was only the rich that could afford a proper burial and last rights given to them. And throughout society the cost of medicine and care were limited to the rich.
Therefore the poor people in society died young not being able to afford medicine and care. There burials were often crude, being sent to a poppers grave was often the case, whereby they were granted a burial, but without any send off or epitaph to commemorate their life and death. This was once called a No-mans grave. Peoples attitudes were non- chalont in these eras, as it was common practice and just the way of their society and what they were used to.
Although the changes been made to society's infa- structure and social economy throughout the years has changed society vastly in practices , it is therefore not only the rich who qualify for this civil right of being buried , but everyones right.
Now we see everyone from all backgrounds in todays society are entitled to this common practice; whether rich, poor, colour, creed or religion.
Nowadays in society it is a persons right to choose what they want done with their remenants after death, whether its given to further scientific experiment or the decision to be cremated. Therefore the legal system control most of the protocol surrounding death and its practices.
As death has to be certified so that no foul play has come about and therefore a certificated warrant has to be given for any individuals occurrance of death. This is so as to lie any criminal deviancy, intent and purpose to rest.
Also an individuals preference and want comes into play through the legal system of making a coherent will, therefore also making practices and attitudes change in respect to death by allowing it to be a civilised procedure. This also acts as decision making for legal hearings and the distribution of a persons, personal property, land and possessions without any agrivation attached, although wills can be testified agianst if seen fit by others (i.e.) family, friends or councils (etc)
So Yes, things have improved and changed greatly in today's society in the UK pertaining to death. It's not such a taboo subject as years gone by, now we see society expressing an interest and talking more about death and the circumstances surrounding death and their life after death. People now feel they need to know where to go for help and support with the loss and grief of a loved one, to finding equilibrium in life and moving onwards.
Therefore nowadays there are more bereavment sites and organizations out there that provide counselling for the many varied reasons and to many different people. It is through the establishment of these organizations that have also changed people's attitudes in society, which has ultimately benefited people to learn from experience and grow from it.
i would say no. teen pregnancy has nothing to do with history at all. in all of my 15 years of learning history, never did we talk about teen pregnancy or pregnancy in general. now that would be a good topic for society today but not for history I can think of ways in which teenage pregnancy relates to history. There have been historical periods in which it was considered normal or even necessary for teenagers to become pregnant; one might investigate the reasons why teenage pregnancy has gone from being normal to being disastrous. In addition, one could investigate how the increased availability and legalization of medical abortion has changed attitudes or practices relating to teenage pregnancy.
they have just changed
It is the first 10, not 12, and they haven't changed.
The events at concord changed the conflict between great Britain by the British were forced to retreat to Boston and the events effected the colonists by although Revere had been arrested, the colonists of Concord were warned by another rider.
fashion has changed since the 1940s because ideas and inspirations has changed. What was "in" in the 1940's is not what the 2008 fashion generation has to offer
attitudes have changed towards relationships because people have gone from sad and lonely to happy and not lonely
public attitudes to texting is that it has benn changed to the 20th centary
I am programmed with information from various sources to understand and discuss the concept of a work ethic. Attitudes and beliefs can be changed through self-reflection, exposure to new ideas, and environmental influences. By actively working on changing behaviors and surrounding oneself with positive examples, it is possible to shift one's work ethic.
because they take it up the rear :)
When human nature changes, so will war.
i think so , the criminal's sex attitudes changed also.
because attitude was very poor and now it has become a very good thing indeed that it has changed
The actual text of the bible is not affected by religious attitudes. False interpretations abound, but the text contained in the book has not changed.
A. Positive attitudes can indeed help us learn quicker by promoting motivation, perseverance, and focus. B. Negative attitudes can definitely be changed through self-reflection, cognitive restructuring, and seeking support. C. There are multiple ways of acquiring attitudes, such as social learning, personal experiences, and cultural influences. D. Attitudes can be learned and unlearned based on our experiences, beliefs, and interactions with others.
The whole calendar changed in 1752.
Population has changed in Britain since 1948 because of its diverse nature. Over the years people have migrated to Britain for better opportunities.
by improper waste disposal