No amendment can alter equal representation in the Senate without the consent of the state. This is expressed in Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution.
In the 20th century, the process for becoming a member of the U.S. Senate changed significantly with the adoption of the 17th Amendment in 1913, which established the direct election of senators by the voters of each state. Prior to this amendment, senators were chosen by state legislatures, which often led to political maneuvering and corruption. The shift to direct election aimed to increase democratic representation and accountability, allowing citizens to have a more direct voice in their government. This change reflected broader reforms in the U.S. political system during the Progressive Era, emphasizing transparency and public participation.
The Great Compromise settled the dispute of state representation in the U.S. Congress. It was decided that representation in the U.S. House of Representatives would be proportional to population, while representation in the U.S. Senate would be equal among all states.
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was first drafted by Alice Paul in 1923. It aimed to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. The amendment was eventually passed by the Senate in 1972, but it required ratification by three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution.
The original Equal Rights Amendment was written in 1923 by a leader of the Suffrage Movement, Alice Paul. It was introduced and passed the House and Senate in 1972 but was never ratified.
The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise, pleased both the small states and the large states because it gave them both the representation they wanted. In the lower house (the House of Representatives), the small states got the proportional representation they wanted. In the upper house (the Senate), the large states got the equal representation they wanted with every state getting two senators.
No amendment could change equal representation in the senate without
Article V - last clause "no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."
Commerce between the states, and a state's representation in the senate
They were in favour. The House of Representatives passed the amendment - here,northern states had a majority as they had more representatives due to their larger populations.In the Senate,where representation between Free and Slave states was balanced,the bill admitting Missouri as a state was passed without the amendment.
two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate must vote to change the constitution. then the amendment must be revised by the judicial branch to make sure that the amendment is constitutional
Senate. Every state has two senators, and this can't be changed without a constitutional amendment; and in this special case, it would require UNANIMOUS consent to change the "2 senators per state" rule.
The U.S. Constitution places a restriction on proposed amendments in Article V, which states that no amendment can deprive a state of its equal representation in the Senate without that state's consent. This ensures that any changes to the structure of the Senate cannot occur without the agreement of the states involved, maintaining their equal status in the legislative process.
Representation in the US senate is not based on population. Each state has two senators. The House's representation is based on population.
The Senate.
The Sevnteenth Amendment
The senate
the 17th Amendment passed in 1913, reversed the power of the states, removing their control over Washington and creating two separate and redundant Houses of the People