answersLogoWhite

0

At the time the constitution did not encompass the rights of the indigenous or native people. The concept of the victor taking the spoils while the conquered suffered the consequences was the viewpoint that was expressed.

If the concept of the Indian Removal Act is aggravating - read the Sioux Treaty of 1868. In this document it takes away as fast as it gives rights to the Sioux people.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
More answers

Sadly, technically no. The Native Americans were not seen as US citizens, thus did not have rights under the constitution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

no

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the Indian Removal act constitutional?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp