answersLogoWhite

0

At the time the constitution did not encompass the rights of the indigenous or native people. The concept of the victor taking the spoils while the conquered suffered the consequences was the viewpoint that was expressed.

If the concept of the Indian Removal Act is aggravating - read the Sioux Treaty of 1868. In this document it takes away as fast as it gives rights to the Sioux people.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
More answers

Sadly, technically no. The Native Americans were not seen as US citizens, thus did not have rights under the constitution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

no

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the Indian Removal act constitutional?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp