answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The answer is ................................................ The Interior Plains

User Avatar

Candido Kohler

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What part of the us have particularly rich farmlands?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What part of the US have rich farmland?

The part of the US that has rich farmland is the Southeast.


How do farmlands in the US get water?

irrigation


Farmlands in the US evolved from?

US. don't you know that *****. ****your ****. Love you too!


Where is rice grown in the US?

They're grown in farmlands


How many US states had organic certified farmlands in 2008?

All states in the United States of America had organic certified farmlands in 2008. The greatest number of organic farmers and organic farmlands occurred in California, Wisconsin, Washington, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Ohio, Iowa and Vermont. The lowest number was in Delaware.


When was Rich Like Us created?

Rich Like Us was created in 1985.


Is the us rich or poor?

Very Rich


Is us a rich country if so why?

Type your answer here... no our country is the fattest country you idiot! we are poor as the bad part of China


What is the duration of The Rich Are Always with Us?

The duration of The Rich Are Always with Us is 1.18 hours.


How many pages does Rich Like Us have?

Rich Like Us has 301 pages.


Which part of the US has rich farm Lands?

Middle U.S and the south, mid us grows bread(nickname the bread basket of america) and the south grows fruit


Which part of the whole grain is the nutrient-rich part?

The thing about whole grain that makes it nutrient-rich is that it's "whole". If there was a part of it that had all the nutrients, then they would separate it and sell us that part. They've been separating it and selling us only a part of the grain for a hundred years. Do you think they're intentionally discarding the nutrient-rich part and selling us the junk part ? There would be no reason to do that, because if the other part had all the nutrients in it, then they could just switch the parts and double the price. The grain has one nutrient in this part, another nutrient in that part, and a different nutrient in another part. If you throw anything away, you throw away something that would be good for you. That's why the recommendation of the nutritionists is to eat the "whole grain". It's not to reduce the producers' processing costs. It's to get all the nutrients in the grain into you.