the statement of the thing is a ndufferent thing
Stronger groups have the right to rule and control weaker groups.
The main issue of federalism during 1789 to 1865 was whether States would accept the federal government as the ultimate authority. The United States practices dual federalism.
America should support the goals of the French Revolution
it is only fair to give extra help to people from disadvantage groups
Federalism
The people should support the provisional governments efforts to reform Russian politics.
We can get countries to change their policies by hurting their economy.
government must protect citizens from abuse by insurance companies
I wouldn't agree with that statement to any extant. Look at every country that isn't under a democracy or a republic, they have little to no human rights.
It would depend on the statement being referenced, but typically individuals who share similar values, beliefs, or ideologies would be more likely to agree with a statement.
A supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan might argue that these military interventions were necessary to combat terrorism, promote democracy, and ensure global security. They would likely emphasize the importance of removing oppressive regimes, which could provide a breeding ground for extremist groups. Additionally, supporters might claim that the wars were integral to protecting U.S. interests and maintaining stability in the Middle East.
a supporter is helpful to what is wanted to be done
Federalism plays a major role in the government.
Federalism were people who fought so we would have rights.
A supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan might state, "These military interventions are crucial for combating terrorism and promoting democracy in the Middle East. By removing oppressive regimes, we are creating a safer world and helping to establish governments that respect human rights. Our involvement demonstrates a commitment to global security and the protection of American interests."
To provide an accurate response, I would need to know the specific statement in question. Please share the statement you'd like me to analyze!
Agrarians is the answer