0
immigrants are introducing filth into the cities and taking american jobs
What else can I help you with?
Nativist in the 1920s would probably have approved of which earlier action?
pure food and drug act
The philosopher mencius would most likely support which of these concepts?
Taoism
Which of these men would most likely support the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Lyndon Johnson
Which argument would most likely be attributed to a Progressive reformer?
"Reduce the power of corrupt party leaders.
What would A group that wants to lower costs by encouraging competition likely support?
free trade agreements]
In the is there a god argument which side of the argument has more evidence to support it?
No, there is no logical argument that is more supported or logically sound than an atheist's. If there was, it likely would be well known.
What would a socially conservative politician MOST LIKELY support?
Which of these would a socially conservative politician MOST LIKELY support?
What did nativist want to stop?
Nativist wanted to stop all Immigration to the US from Asia. They believed the Asians would take all of the jobs.
How do you think nativist s would have defined a real American?
A nativist would define a "real" American as a native-born, white citizen from America.
What did nativist fear immigrants would do the 1890s?
Take jobs away from Americans
What author most likely use to support a synthesis claim?
An author would likely use evidence from a variety of sources, such as scholarly articles, books, research studies, and expert opinions, to support a synthesis claim. By incorporating multiple perspectives and data points, the author can provide a comprehensive and well-rounded argument for their claim.
Why would a letter from the author support his argument better than an essay?
it can be less threatening and more personal for the reader.
A major argument used to support the building of the suez and panama canals was that these waterways would?
shorten trade routes
Which government theory would a 17th-century European king most likely support?
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
What is taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion?
It sounds like what might be a very effective rhetorical device if used skilfully. The idea would be to take elements of the opponent's argument and use the facts presented to support outcomes that few if any would support.
What was an argument made by support of vocational training in African American colleges and universities?
it would help them fit in with white society
What was an argument made by support of vocational training in African Americans colleges and universities?
it would help them fit in with white society
