immigrants are introducing filth into the cities and taking american jobs
pure food and drug act
Taoism
"Reduce the power of corrupt party leaders.
Lyndon Johnson
free trade agreements]
No, there is no logical argument that is more supported or logically sound than an atheist's. If there was, it likely would be well known.
Which of these would a socially conservative politician MOST LIKELY support?
Nativist wanted to stop all Immigration to the US from Asia. They believed the Asians would take all of the jobs.
An author would likely use evidence from a variety of sources, such as scholarly articles, books, research studies, and expert opinions, to support a synthesis claim. By incorporating multiple perspectives and data points, the author can provide a comprehensive and well-rounded argument for their claim.
A nativist would define a "real" American as a native-born, white citizen from America.
Take jobs away from Americans
A musician would likely use a combination of musical elements such as melody, harmony, rhythm, and dynamics to craft an argument. These components help convey emotions and themes, allowing the musician to express their message effectively. Additionally, lyrics can serve as a powerful tool for articulating specific ideas or narratives that support the overall argument. Ultimately, the interplay of these musical tools creates a compelling and persuasive artistic statement.
it can be less threatening and more personal for the reader.
shorten trade routes
It sounds like what might be a very effective rhetorical device if used skilfully. The idea would be to take elements of the opponent's argument and use the facts presented to support outcomes that few if any would support.
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
it would help them fit in with white society