Hawaii was being effectively run by (primarily) foreign business interests, and in 1893, Queen Liliuokalani attempted to establish a new constitution that would have effectively restored the monarchy and its power to govern the islands. But the U.S. and other national interests blocked this effort by making claims regarding a threat to U.S. citizens on the island, and John Stevens, the U.S. Government Minister of Hawaii, called upon U.S. troops to provide protection for those U.S. citizens. The presence of armed U.S. Marines washed away any hopes the native Hawaiians had of restoring self rule. A link is provided to the specific section of the Wikipedia article on Hawaii that speaks to the history of the islands. Another link is provided to the Wikipedia article that is an expanded history of the events and personalities involved in the stripping of Hawaii of its independence.
Chat with our AI personalities
All of the subcontinent was not united under any past native ruler or government because the whole Indo-Pak subcontinent has never been a single nation and it was so vast and with slow and different communication ,it was impossible for a single ruler to govern the whole of it
The ruler Napoleon Bonaparte had plans for empires in Europe and Americas because he wanted to expand his reign and wealth.
The ruler of a colony might well be a VICEROY.
A group of people or territory ruled by one ruler is called an empire
in 1795, king kamehameha i became ruler of most of this state