Usually it was two horses that pulled the covered wagon. ----- There were different kinds of covered wagons. The small ones might have been pulled by two horses, but the large ones needed more than that. The Conestoga wagons were big enough to carry six tons of cargo, and were pulled by teams of as many as eight horses, or a dozen oxen. There are links below.
During the time of the American frontier, settlers wanted to move west to live a more fruitful life. When they headed west, they were attacked by the Indians who often killed them and stole their horses, mules, and oxen.
Because the roads were rough and hard to travel on, water was the most efficient way to transport things from place to place. they did however, use oxen and horses to move people and light loads, but most towns had rivers or canals or something like that to help move cargo from one place to the next.
In 1624, Edward Winslow brought the first three ox from England -thank you rural heritage website
Actually the earliest people in the Americas did have horses available, but they used them as a source of food not as "beasts of burden", this hunting drove the American horses into extinction.Without "beasts of burden" the people of the Americas used either dogs or had to carry loads themselves. In South America the llamas (relatives of camels) were domesticated as "beasts of burden".
Oxen, mules and horses
Horses, mules or oxen.
Oxen. And BTW, you spelled immigrants wrong
Oxen were cheaper than horses, and stronger than mules.
The covered wagons were usually drawn by oxen, and, later, mules.
horses , oxen and mules
Mules and oxen are very strong, very sturdy creatures, making them ideal for pulling great amounts of cargo over long distances in harsh conditions.
In the gold rush era usually heavy wagons were pulled by either horses, oxen or mules.
they used herbal remedies an made it with mortar and pestal
Very few horses were used . . . the wagons were almost universally pulled by a team of oxen, or a team of mules. Mules and horses needed grass or grain to stay healthy, but oxen could feed on pretty much anything. Mules and horses needed to eat constantly, but an ox could store food in any of four stomachs and could be fed at morning and evening and work all day. Mules were especially difficult to control, and both horses and mules would wander from camp, but oxen stayed put and were easy to control. Oxen were a third as much as mules and much less than that for horses. An entire team of oxen could be purchased for the cost of a horse. Oxen were good in mud and slippery conditions, but horses and mules were not. On the other hand, oxen were not good in heat, so they tended to be used in the summer in the morning and evening with a siesta during the heat of the day. Mules could do a third again the number of miles that oxen could, but were not very strong, and had poor stamina. Oxen could use a yoke and push their load, but horses and mules needed complicated harnesses to pull their load. Hooking up oxen in the morning took much less time than hooking up mules or horses. Once you got to your location, oxen could plow and do other things and were considered good meat, but horses and mules were less useful at the destination and were considered poor meat.
To pull their wagons, trfthe Mormon Pioneers used horses, mules, oxen and sometimes even pulled them by hand!
oxen