Hubris combined with lack of information. A great read on this is Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (1984). Her description of the British Parliament's debates about the rebels in the colonies is eerily reminiscent of the US debates about Vietnam and Iraq, with similar catastrophic results.
Hubris combined with lack of information. A great read on this is Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (1984). Her description of the British Parliament's debates about the rebels in the colonies is eerily reminiscent of the US debates about Vietnam and Iraq, with similar catastrophic results.
Hubris combined with lack of information. A great read on this is Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (1984). Her description of the British Parliament's debates about the rebels in the colonies is eerily reminiscent of the US debates about Vietnam and Iraq, with similar catastrophic results.
Hubris combined with lack of information. A great read on this is Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (1984). Her description of the British Parliament's debates about the rebels in the colonies is eerily reminiscent of the US debates about Vietnam and Iraq, with similar catastrophic results.
I Think bc of the cause
The "Declaration of Sentiments and Grievances" adopted by the Seneca Falls convention stated: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, . . ." This paragraph of the Declaration of Sentiments and Grievances was based closely on the American colonies' Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, except that it stated these truths were self-evident with respect to both men and women, while the Declaration of Independence referred only to men. The Seneca Falls convention was the first women's rights convention ever held in the United States. The Declaration of Sentiments and Grievances was drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, one of the organizers of the convention and one of the first and most important advocates of women's rights in the United States.
yes he does
The south refuse to abolish slavery as the inhabitants needed workers to work in the fields for themDifferent types of works done by the slaves:Till the soilRemove big rocksplantation of sugar canesconstruction of roadscook foods for their masters and ..........etc
names of union members that are circulated among company owners who then refuse to hire those workers.wow real smartthe real answer is black list or black listed.
Because King George the 3rd was still mad about the colonists protesting.
He didn't refuse to sign the Treaty of Paris- he ratified it in April 1784. He didn't personally go to Paris to negotiate the treaty- he sent someone else in his place. This was normal, and still is normal to this day. He did refuse other things, like the "Olive Branch Petition" in 1775.
Some sources say King George III refused to receive the petition because of his personal dislike for John Dickinson.
He refuse to be the king.
The Whiskey Rebellion, because he thought that for farmers to refuse to pay their taxes would cause the government to collapse.
The people who refused to sign the Declaration of Independense was Tomas Jefferson, and two other people.
to urge colonists to refuse british goods
George Washington
Vanderlay industries
yes.
Virginia
He felt it gave the government too much power over society.