answersLogoWhite

0

A usually expansionist national policy having as its sole principle advancement of the national interest, based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Describe the idea of realpolitik
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about World History

What policies characterized realpolitik?

Realpolitik is a political approach that prioritizes practical and realistic considerations over ideological or moral principles. It often involves pursuing national interests through pragmatic and calculated strategies, even if they involve controversial or amoral actions. Realpolitik policies typically prioritize power dynamics, strategic alliances, and state security above all else, often leading to a focus on maintaining stability and influence in the international arena.


What are the pros and cons of the policy of realpolitik?

Ah, realpolitik is like painting a landscape with bold, realistic strokes. The pros include practical decision-making based on current circumstances, leading to stability and security. However, the cons may involve potential ethical concerns or strained relationships due to prioritizing national interests over moral principles. Remember, every policy decision is like a color on your palette - it's all about finding the right balance.


Paleolithic animal pinting could not be describe as?

paleolithic animal painting could not be describe as


What two words describe the Hellenistic period of Greek Sculpture?

Giant and decadent are two words to describe this period.


Describe the idea of separation of powers What would be two examples of how your lives would be different if the Constitution did not provide for separation of powers?

The separation of powers was to keep any one branch of government from being to powerful. If this had not been in the constitution one branch could become way to powerful and destroy the nation as we know it