Sparta was a city-state of ancient Greece. It was not a person unless you are talking about someone named Sparta, in which case you should be more specific about who you are asking about. Example: MSG John Sparta, or Lt Sparta Griffin, or the name of a famous Spartan soldier.
Spartan boys went to live in the barracks at the age of seven. They were often beaten with a cane, which supposedly made them stronger. They ended their training at the age of eighteen and joined the army when they were twenty. If they served honorably in the army, they became a full Spartan citizen at the age of thirty. Spartan men continue to fight until the age of sixty, where they settle down and are given a small piece of land and some helots (slaves).
in short, they join at the age of 20
Napoleon's army was about 600,000 men before he invaded Russia. At the battle of Waterloo, he had a mere 60,000 men and got destroyed along with 220 of his approximate 240 artillery guns.
By September of 1794 the French Army had approximately 1.5 million men under arms.
There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.
Ataxalpa was the Incan semi-divine ruler who's giant army was defeated by Francisco Pizarro and his men. He is also known as Atahualpa.
There probably would have been something like that number; the total number is generally taken as between 2 and 3 million (!) men, women, and children.The Bible does not reveal the total number, but there were 600,000 men:-Exo 12:37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children.(For census purposes, only men of military age were counted: women and children were not included. The women and younger children were possibly riding on wagons, while the older children walked with their fathers and older brothers.)Playing with figures:1. Suppose all the men in the army were married, each family had 3 young children:-Men 600,000Their wives 600,0003 Children /family 1,800,000TOTAL 3,000,0002. Suppose a quarter of the men in the army were married with 5 children, with 3 of the sons with their father in the army:-Men - married 150,000Wives 150,000Men - sons 450,0002 children/family not in army 300,000TOTAL 1,050,000The minimum number fleeing Egypt would have been 1 million, making an average of these two somewhat-unrealistic scenarios of 2 million people. Add another couple of hundred thousand for men too old to be in the army, widows, unmarried women, and Egyptians, and there would easily be 2.5 million fleeing Egypt.
Until They're 60.
The Spartan army was made up of Spartan men who have been trained in the art of warfare since they could walk.
lack of numbers. 300 is a poor amount of men for an army.
Spartan men could return to their homes when they were not at war. They could only stay a short time before they had to fight again.
Spartan men could return to their homes when they were not at war. They could only stay a short time before they had to fight again.
Yes, Spartan men were expected to serve in the military from the age of 20 until they were 60 years old. This was part of the agoge system, which aimed to train and discipline Spartan citizens for warfare.
When Spartan men turned 20, they were expected to marry. However, they could not have a household of their own. They had to live and eat in military barracks, where they shared expenses with other soldiers. They could retire from the army when they were 60 years old.
All Spartan men had to be solders
The Men work was that they train for war.
The Spartan men were takin from there mothers at the age of 7 to start training for the Army. When they were 30 they were able to come home to there family but if they were told they need to serve they had to. When they became 60 years of age they retired from the Army if they made it to that age.
All men in Spartan civilization were soldiers. Whether the man was small or big they still had to join the army to actually be citizens. In mythology they are all portrayed as big and muscly. They would have been very strong as they trained from the age of 7 but even the small men had to be soldiers.
because im awesome