0
Sparta was a city-state of ancient Greece. It was not a person unless you are talking about someone named Sparta, in which case you should be more specific about who you are asking about. Example: MSG John Sparta, or Lt Sparta Griffin, or the name of a famous Spartan soldier.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Coach
Rene
RafaSpartan boys went to live in the barracks at the age of seven. They were often beaten with a cane, which supposedly made them stronger. They ended their training at the age of eighteen and joined the army when they were twenty. If they served honorably in the army, they became a full Spartan citizen at the age of thirty. Spartan men continue to fight until the age of sixty, where they settle down and are given a small piece of land and some helots (slaves).
in short, they join at the age of 20
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How big was napoleons army?
Napoleon's army was about 600,000 men before he invaded Russia. At the battle of Waterloo, he had a mere 60,000 men and got destroyed along with 220 of his approximate 240 artillery guns.
What is the size of the French army?
By September of 1794 the French Army had approximately 1.5 million men under arms.
Roman officer in command of 100 soilders?
There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.
Who is ataxalpa?
Ataxalpa was the Incan semi-divine ruler who's giant army was defeated by Francisco Pizarro and his men. He is also known as Atahualpa.
Is it true there were 2.5 million Israelites fleeing Egypt?
There probably would have been something like that number; the total number is generally taken as between 2 and 3 million (!) men, women, and children.The Bible does not reveal the total number, but there were 600,000 men:-Exo 12:37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children.(For census purposes, only men of military age were counted: women and children were not included. The women and younger children were possibly riding on wagons, while the older children walked with their fathers and older brothers.)Playing with figures:1. Suppose all the men in the army were married, each family had 3 young children:-Men 600,000Their wives 600,0003 Children /family 1,800,000TOTAL 3,000,0002. Suppose a quarter of the men in the army were married with 5 children, with 3 of the sons with their father in the army:-Men - married 150,000Wives 150,000Men - sons 450,0002 children/family not in army 300,000TOTAL 1,050,000The minimum number fleeing Egypt would have been 1 million, making an average of these two somewhat-unrealistic scenarios of 2 million people. Add another couple of hundred thousand for men too old to be in the army, widows, unmarried women, and Egyptians, and there would easily be 2.5 million fleeing Egypt.
