What did people live in in the 1300's
I suppose they live in very big houses as they were very rich people, they helped the kings run the country, so they would live very well.
highwaymen live in the epping forest or in caves!noo they lived with everybody else so they could blend in and nobody would no they were highwaymen
The Yangtze and Yellow Rivers
If you were an indentured servant you would live in colonial America and you would probably live in the house of a rich general. You would basically have no life and get paid very little if at all. Most indentured servants were very young, starting at even age 13. You're duties would be to clean, cook, and you may even be assingned to a specific person in the house. You would take care of that person and clean their room and bring them meals. Hope my answer was helpful to you!
the vassal would go to court with other vassals belonging to your lord and if you were found guilty, you would have to give up your fiefdom.
A vassal was a person, and a fief was land. A vassal swore allegiance and support to a king, and the king gave the vassal fief to live on.
The Day I Tried to Live was created in 1994.
The Feudal lord provides the Vassal with land. The Vassal, in return, vows to fight for the Feudal lord, or serve him in various ways. The serfs who are mostly poor will be needing protection as well as a place to live in (err-- land). Thus, the serfs are usually required to pay taxes or till the vassal's land or serve the vassal. The reciprocal relationship between the feudal lord, vassal, and serf shows that neither can live without the other. Land, on the other hand, is given much importance because a thousand years ago, everybody wanted/needed land. (Territory was a necessity)
Lords owned land, which they did not grant to their vassals, but they did grant the right to live and work on that land as tenants.
A vassal is a free person who enters into a mutual agreement with a lord to provide military or other services in exchange for land, while a serf is a peasant who is bound to the land and obligated to work for a lord in exchange for protection and security. Vassals have more autonomy and legal rights compared to serfs.
To protect the rights of a nation. Where then can independently live according to their live style and can perform their religious obligations.
Treaties can be loosely compared to contracts: both are means of willing parties assuming obligations among themselves, and a party to either that fails to live up to their obligations can be held liable under international law.
they tried to keep there families safe or they would go live with their families
I would say no! Sorry about your life. )':
Frankly speaking, no human being lives up to his obligations. If a ruler does not live up to his obligations and yet his rule is established and he is followed by the majority, no Muslim has the right to rebel (Khrooj) against him. The Muslim scholars, though, are divided in their opinion, yet most of them say that to avoid bloodshed of the Muslims, the ruler should be advised by the scholars to mend his ways. Yet, rebellion will be Un-Islamic if it results into bloodshed, disorder and disharmony in the Muslim society. A common Muslim should try to live up to his own obligations.
the services the vassals had to offer his lord were to expect to live up to the bargain, (feudal contract). If they followed this rule there would be peace maintained. Vassals could get tittled to land by purchase, marriage, or a gift from lord by service in war.