answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In ancient Rome, an officer with authority to judge cases of equity, responsibility for producing public games, and, in the absence of a consul, extensive authority in the government. After a one-year term, a praetor typically went on to govern a province. This was taken from the Brittanica Encyclopedia.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Praetors were in charge of what laws?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who is in charge of changing or supervising gun laws?

Depends on which laws. The US Congress is in charge of Federal laws, and the State legislature in in charge of State laws.


Who were the individuals that interpreted laws in court?

During the Roman Republic the praetors, who were the second highest ranking officers of state, were like chiefs justices. They issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetors' policy on judicial matters for their term of office (one year). Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors were not legislators and could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development and improvement of Roman law during the Republic owed a lot to the praetors. This role ended when emperors took charge of legislation. Jurists (legal experts) played a crucial role in the formulation legal matters and the development of Roman law. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists and their replies were often used for the compilation of their edicts. Emperors also relied on the advice of jurists for their own edicts. The emperor Justinian I commissioned two textbooks for law students in the 6th century AD. They relied heavily on the writings of some prominent jurists of the 2nd and 3rd century AD


What Romans interpreted laws and acted as judges?

During the Roman Republic the praetors, who were the second highest ranking officers of state, were like chiefs justices. They issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetors' policy on judicial matters for their term of office (one year). Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors were not legislators and could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development and improvement of Roman law during the Republic owed a lot to the praetors. This role ended when emperors took charge of legislation. Jurists (legal experts) played a crucial role in the formulation legal matters and the development of Roman law. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists and their replies were often used for the compilation of their edicts. Emperors also relied on the advice of jurists for their own edicts. The emperor Justinian I commissioned two textbooks for law students in the 6th century AD. They relied heavily on the writings of some prominent jurists of the 2nd and 3rd century AD


Who handled affairs in roman government?

It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.It depends on which affatirs you mean. The Roman government was structured in a way that various officials handeled certain aspects of government. For example, the quaestors were in charge of the treasury. The aediles were in charge of weights and measures and public buildings, while the praetors acted as judges. All these officials had a staff of underlings working for him.


What branch of government is in charge of informing laws?

No branch is in charge of informing laws. There are branches for creating and enforcing them.


Who was in charge of enforcing the law in 1787?

The judge is in charge of enforcing laws


What were roman judges that ruled in all legal matters called?

The Roman judges were called "praetors".


Who is in charge of creating the laws rome?

There was not a name for law makers in ancient Rome. The people who made laws changed through the course of the 1,200 years of the history of Rome. During the monarchy (753-509 BC) presumably the king issued laws, even though there is hardly any historical record of this because this period was long before the emergence of the first ancient historians who wrote about the history of Rome. During the early Roman Republic the proposers of bills were the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). In the Mid and Late Republic, the plebeian tribunes, the representatives of the plebeians, were the main proposers of bills. During the rule by emperors which replaced the Republic, the emperors were the law makers. The laws were imperial edicts issued by the emperors. In 366 BC, during the Republic, the office of the praetura was created. The praetors were the second highest ranking officers of state. They were like chiefs justices. They issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetors' policy on judicial matters for their term of office (one year). Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors were not legislators and could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development and improvement of Roman law during the Republic owed a lot to the praetors. This role ended when emperors took charge of legislation. Jurists (legal experts) played a crucial role in the formulation legal matters and the development of Roman law. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists and their replies were often used for the compilation of the edicts. Emperors also relied on the advice of jurists for their own edicts. The emperor Justinian I commissioned two textbooks for law students in the 6th century AD. They relied heavily on the writings of some prominent jurists of the 2nd and 3rd century AD.


What is the giant pandas praetors?

The Emperor Penguin


Who in the roman repulic were in charge of making the laws?

Senators


What does the law of charge state?

it means the 3 laws


Who was in charge of the laws in New York?

Dward Macy