answersLogoWhite

0

Czar Nicholas II was the last ruler of the Romanov family dynasty that had ruled the great empire of Russia for over 300 hundred years. He became Czar of Russia at the age of 26 because of the untimely and unexpected death of his father. Not only was he not ready to fill this position, but he was not skilled in the areas of working with the common people and in government. Although Nicholas was a good leader in some areas, he lacked experience and could be controlled too easily. He experienced trials in his personal and public life as Czar of Russia.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
More answers

None of the Tsars of Russia were good ruler's they were all tyrants.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

he was a really bad leader because he wanted to keep russia the same way it used to be

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was tsar nicholas 2 a good or bad ruler?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp