0
Czar Nicholas II was the last ruler of the Romanov family dynasty that had ruled the great empire of Russia for over 300 hundred years. He became Czar of Russia at the age of 26 because of the untimely and unexpected death of his father. Not only was he not ready to fill this position, but he was not skilled in the areas of working with the common people and in government. Although Nicholas was a good leader in some areas, he lacked experience and could be controlled too easily. He experienced trials in his personal and public life as Czar of Russia.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the Bolsheviks come to power?
The Bolsheviks came to power, by shutting down an election by force when the socialist revolutionaries won the election. The leader of the Bolsheviks, were just as bad as Tsar Nicholas II.
Was domitian a good or bad ruler?
Bad. For roman patircians and for Senate he was bad ruler cause he hated nobility and having bad reputation he did resort all kind of cruelity to ensure his authority and power. He also persecuted Jews and Christians (one theory says that it was Domitian who is actual anichrist mentioned in Book of Revelations). He did start unsucceful campaign in Dacia and caused financial disaster.
How bad was King Cnut ruler of England defeated?
Read about Cnut in full on http://www.englandandenglishhistory.com
Is China's government bad or good?
it is good and bad
Why are alliances bad?
It depends on the scenario, not all alliances are good and not all are bad.
The relationship between Tsar nicholas II and his people?
Tsar Nicholas II's relationship with his people was very poor, he didn't care that they were sitting on the sidewalk, that they had no food and very bad wages.
How was hadrin a good or bad ruler?
How was Hadrian a good or bad ruler
Why were many Russians unhappy with tsar Nicholas?
Because they felt that he was unfit to rule because of the bad living standards
How were the peasants treated with Tsar nicholas ll?
Peasants during Tsar Nicholas II's reign were generally treated poorly. They faced harsh conditions, poverty, and oppression under his rule. The failure to address their needs and grievances contributed to the discontent that eventually led to the Russian Revolution.
Is the England ruler a good ruler or bad ruler?
she is the best ruler because she loves Canadian bacon.
Was Chandragupta maurya good or bad ruler?
Chandragupta Maurya was a good ruler. He was ruler from 322 BC to 298 BC. He died in the year of 298 BC.
What is one primary source proving Philip ii of Spain was a bad ruler?
he was a good ruler
How did the Bolsheviks come to power?
The Bolsheviks came to power, by shutting down an election by force when the socialist revolutionaries won the election. The leader of the Bolsheviks, were just as bad as Tsar Nicholas II.
Was Aurelian a good or bad ruler?
A good one, he did many things that were of great benefit to the empire
Was Montezuma ii a good or bad ruler?
yes, majority of the aztecs where happy with him.
Who were bad leaders?
British ruler, japan ruler, German ruler
Give reasons why the Tsar was unpopular?
Because they felt that he was unfit to rule because of the bad living standards
