answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Comparing and contrasting historical sources

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about World History

How are historians similar to detectives?

Historians and detectives both record events from the past and find out, how,when,who did it and why it happened. They both go to the scene and collect evidence that could be useful and help them find out what happened.they both study the evidence up close for dna that could be useful to help find out the mystery or problem.


How do historians regard the sage kings and the three cultural heroes today?

they are both considered mythical.


Which of the follwing is credited with being the world's first republic?

Although it is known that the Romans and Greece both had the foundations of a republic, historians assert that the first republic was Vaisali, India, This was in the state of Bihar. The foundations of a republic, historians claim was circa 500-300BCE. Far later, the Portuguese were credited with establishing the first Republic in Europe.


What are the limitations of the sources of history?

What is known about ancient history is based on sources and it can be expected that these sources are limited if only because of the time an ancient historical event happened and the present day. Nevertheless, here are the source limitations faced by historians in their studies:A. Ancient historical writings about history may have been written hundreds of years after the historian begins a record. In dealing with the writings of the ancients it must be remembered that they did not have the resources that modern day historians have, such as carbon dating and a vast network of "finds" based on modern archeology. Therefore the accuracy of ancient historians can be called into question;B. While modern historians can rely on archaeologists with scientific data to assist them, they are limited, because of time, to explain "cultural" facts that may have influenced the ancient writers;C. Modern historians must base much of their writings upon the records of ancient historians, which may be inaccurate. By the same token, the same problem confronted the ancient historians as they too must rely on earlier writers;D. Historians, both modern and ancient, understand that the sources of previous writers may be prejudicial. This may be the result, for example of a writer in the time of Julius Caesar. If the historian favors the deeds of a Caesar, the historical records may not be totally accurate;E. Since we have Caesar here, his own writings on his conquests in Gaul must always be seen as a man writing about his own history. Thus the source can be questioned;F. Conflicting historical writings can always exist. The historian reviewing these faces another source limitation;G. Lack of historical records. The ancient Egyptians have left no blueprints on building pyramids. Scholars, archeologists, and engineers and others still speculate how they were built; andH. Myths. Historians are frequently faced with ancient historians who may have based their writings on "myths". For all practical purposes, as one example, the founding of ancient Rome is dated at 753 BC, this is an educated guess. It may also be termed a myth, thus the historian is faced with another limited source.


Where was Charlemagne crowned emperor?

Charlemagne was crowned emperor in St. Peter's Basilica, in Rome, on December 25, 800. This act created what historians call the Carolingian Empire, which was ancestral to both the the Holy Roman Empire and the Kingdom of France. Charlemagne is considered Charles I of both countries. At the time of the coronation, and for quite a while after, the empire called itself the Roman Empire. Unfortunately the Byzantine Empire also called itself the Roman Empire. Modern historians use the terms they do to avoid confusion. For more, please use the link below.

Related questions

How are historians similar to detectives?

Historians and detectives both record events from the past and find out, how,when,who did it and why it happened. They both go to the scene and collect evidence that could be useful and help them find out what happened.they both study the evidence up close for dna that could be useful to help find out the mystery or problem.


What are the similarities between a historian of Jesus and an archaeologist?

Historians and archaeologists both, at least in principle, look for evidence and then analyse the evidence, without regard for what scriptures may say.


How historians study the past?

Historians study the past by studying the previous recorded events of the past activities. They use both the scientific and traditional methods to gather such information which they then use to compile their documentary evidence.


Are snakes anabolism or catabolism?

Both Anabolism and catabolism are both part of an organisms metabolism. One is breaking down biomolecules, catabolism, and one is synthesizing biomolecules, anabolism.


What theorys are to Cleopatra death?

It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.


How where herodotus and thucydides alike?

They were alike because both of them were Historians.


Is unix is multitasking or multithreading?

It uses both techniques.


Were colonial historians prisoners of their time?

As far as both colonial and nationalist historians are concerned they were prisoners of their time to a larger extent.As both history being influenced by the situation. Colonial historians constructed history to justify colonization while nationalist constructed history to spread nationalism. How ever to a lesser extent both colonial and nationalist historians were not prisoners of their time as they write history using common sense,feelings ,objective and favour.


What is management Discretionary expenses techniques artificial or real?

both


What is conflicting evidence?

It is evidence that can tend to support both sides of a question, argument, or case.


What comprises a body of evidence in a trial?

A body of evidence would include all of the evidence of a particular trial. It may be physical evidence or it may be circumstantial evidence or a combination of both.


Is endoplasmic reticulum an animal or plant cell?

Both, ER (endoplasmic reticulum) is in both the animal and plant cell. It helps in the protein-making process by synthesizing and transporting the protein. This is something both animal and plant cells need, hence the prescence of the endoplasmic reticulum in both types of cells.