An advantage of using a written source in history is that the record gives an indication of the time period if happened in. This information can be cross referenced and can help you with your research.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ah, written sources in history hold a special place in our hearts. They capture the thoughts and stories of people from long ago, allowing us to step into their world and understand their experiences. These sources provide us with a window into the past, helping us learn from our ancestors and appreciate the journey that has brought us to where we are today.
Oh, dude, like, written sources are great because they give us, like, actual words from people in the past. It's not just some random person making stuff up, you know? Plus, they can, like, provide detailed information about events and perspectives that we wouldn't get from other sources. So, yeah, written sources are pretty legit for historians trying to figure out what went down back in the day.
A written source in history provides a direct record of events, ideas, and perspectives from the past, offering valuable insights into the time period being studied. It allows historians to analyze primary sources for accuracy, bias, and context, enabling a more nuanced understanding of historical events. Additionally, written sources can be compared and contrasted with other sources to corroborate information and form a more comprehensive narrative of history.
The disadvantage of oral history compared to written history can be best described as the mutation of oral history as it passes from one generation to another due to changing cultural ways.
written historical records can be preserved even after every person who has read them has died.
Easily to use
O ral historical is generally credible, while writing history often contains biases.
also written sources are no easy to lost as thoe of oral sources that a person may even forget due to age reason and healthy status
Historical sources are classified as primary and secondary source. The primary source refers to the written or developed document or object during the study and the secondary source refers to the analogy or interpretation of the primary source.
Describe the babarnama as a source of medieval history
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
the advantages for young generation today should learn to cook?
An essay about China's first emperor written by a university professor