0
What did At the Constitutional Convention delegates from northern and southern states disagreed about?
D. whether the federal government should have the power to regulate slavery.
What else can I help you with?
Difference between northern and Italian renaissance?
Northern Renaissance: nation-states Italy: city-states Northern: strongly influenced by church Italy: less influenced by church Northern: began after Italy Italy: began before Northern Northern: focused on bible, church Italy: focused on classics (Greek/Roman)
Where in India are the northern plains located?
The Northern Plains of India are located in Northern India. More specifically, they are located around the southern Himalayas and home to the Taj Mahal.
Another name of Indo gangetic plain?
Northern Plain and The Northern Indian River Plain
When did the Northern Territory become a colony of Australia?
The Northern Territory was never a colony of Australia. The Northern Territory was founded under the name of "Northern Territory" in 1911, which is when it was separated from South Australia and transferred to Commonwealth control. From 1825 to 1863, the Northern Territory was part of New South Wales, and from 1863 to 1911 it was part of South Australia, at neither time being a separate territory or colony - though there was the outpost of Port Essington on the northern coast. On 1 January 1911, the Northern Territory was removed from South Australia's rule and transferred to Commonwealth control.
What is northern briton?
scot
What did the delegates from the southern and northern states disagreed about?
Government Government
What did northern an southern states disagree over the most at the Constitutional Convention?
The northern and southern states had two major disagreements at the convention. The North disagreed with the use of slaves, and the South disagreed how people were elected to office.
When did Northern Ireland Constitutional Convention happen?
Northern Ireland Constitutional Convention happened on 1975-05-01.
Why are the words slave or slavery NOT in the Constitution?
The convention delegates did not want to upset the sensibilities of the people in the Northern states.
What has the author Ernest Baird written?
Ernest Baird has written: 'The Northern Ireland Convention' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Northern Ireland Constitutional Convention
How did the post - war era french revolution and the constitutional convention reveal and foreshadow the existence and growth of sectional and class differences in the US?
The existence and growth of sectional and class differences in the United States were in fact revealed and also 'foreshadowed' in various ways by events after the (American rather than French) Revolutionary War in the 1780s. The 1787 Constitutional Convention, for instance, highlighted yet again the increasing difference between Southern mindsets and Northern, with 'class' distinctions showing up as significant between convention-delegates as well as within the home-regions of those same delegates.
What fraction of the slaves in a state were included when determining represantation in congress?
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.
What did the debate about slavery at the constitutional convention?
The debate about slavery at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 centered on how to address the institution in the new Constitution, reflecting deep divisions between Northern and Southern states. Southern delegates sought to protect slavery and ensure representation for enslaved individuals in Congress through mechanisms like the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for apportionment purposes. In contrast, many Northern delegates aimed to limit the expansion of slavery and sought to prevent it from being enshrined in the new framework of government. Ultimately, the compromises made during the convention laid the groundwork for ongoing tensions over slavery that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
Was the Civil War constitutional?
It was constitutional because the North was fighting for the "equal rights That's what the fight was about. The southern states thought since they had voluntarily accepted the Constitution they had the right to reject it when they did not agree with the federal government. The northern states disagreed.
Explain the positions of both the northern delegates and the southern delegates on the issue of enslaved Africans?
southern delegates is for slavery they were trying to keep it. northern delegates is against slavery they were trying to get rid of it.
One of the compromises made between northern southern state during the constitutional convention of 1787 concerned?
counting slaves in the population
Why did the northern and southern delegates have different ideas about slavery?
the northern and the south delegates have different ideas about slavery because the southern needed slaves and the northern did not
